* * * *
Welcome to “read the Bible – expand your mind:”
This blog has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (See John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live lives of abundance. (John 10:10.) The third is that God wants us to do even greater miracles than Jesus. (John 14:12.) The fourth – and most overlooked – is that Jesus wants us to read the Bible with an open mind. See Luke 24:45: “Then He” – Jesus – “opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.”
And this thought ties them together:
In the meantime:
The last post I did was on December 14, 2018. (My excuse is the rush of the holidays.) So here goes: The first post of 2019.
On that note, the full 12 Days of Christmas just ended this past Sunday, January 6:
The Twelve Days of Christmas is the festive Christian season [including “Twelfth Night,” shown above left] beginning on Christmas Day … that celebrates the birth of Jesus Christ, as the Son of God. This period is also known as Christmastide… The Feast of the Epiphany is on 6 January [and] celebrates the visit of the Wise Men (Magi) and their bringing of gifts to the child Jesus. In some traditions, the feast of Epiphany and Twelfth Day overlap.
See also Happy Epiphany – 2018, which noted this Feast Day has a number of different names. Like Epiphany proper, which “celebrates the revelation of God incarnate as Jesus Christ.” It’s also known as the last of the Twelve Days of Christmas. (Again, just to confuse things, the evening of January 5 is called Twelfth Night.) But wait, there’s still another name for January 6. It’s also known as Three Kings Day. (As in, “We Three Kings of Orient are…”)
For more on these topics, check Epiphany, circumcision, and “3 wise guys,” and To Epiphany – “and BEYOND!” The “Three Wise Guys” posted noted that in its original sense – circa 600 A.D. – the term Magi meant “followers of Zoroastrianism or Zoroaster.” Also, the consensus that there were three kings started because they brought three gifts: Gold, frankincense, and myrrh.
And while a literal view of the Three Wise Men story has them getting to the manger-scene just after Jesus was born, the truth seems a bit harder to pin down. Some say they arrived the same winter Jesus was born, while others say they came two winters after his birth. That would explain Herod’s order – noted in Matthew 2:16–18 – that his soldiers kill “all the male children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the borders thereof, from two years old and under.” (Known as the “Massacre of the Innocents,” illustrated at right.)
On a more cheerful note, we’re familiar with the three wise men largely thanks to a Christmas carol, “We Three Kings of Orient Are.” (For an “old-timey” version see Kings College Choir, Cambridge. Another note: The “3 wise guys” post went into great detail on the circumcision of Jesus, leading one authority to call January 1st the time “when Our Lord first shed His blood for us.” And about the practice dating back to ancient Egypt, whose “Book of the Dead describes the sun god Ra as having circumcised himself.” (That “Ra guy had to be “One Tough Monkey!”)
And finally, To Epiphany – “and BEYOND” explored the issue of “sin” as sometimes held out:
[T]he concepts of sin, repentance and confession should be viewed as “tools to help us get closer to the target.” In other words, they help us grow and develop, and are not to be used as a means of social control… Note also that the “Biblical Greek term for sin [amartia], means ‘missing the mark,’” and implies that “one’s aim is out and that one has not reached the goal, one’s fullest potential.”
And that – after all – is what the true Christian should be working for, during these alternating seasons of celebration and reflection: To reach his or her full potential…
* * * *
But the main thing to remember here is that this whole season celebrates the idea that Christmastide celebrates the birth of “something new under the sun.” It celebrates the birth of a new – non-conservative – way of thinking about God. It celebrates the birth of a new – and far easier – way to approach God. And it celebrates the birth of a new way to get closer to God.
But as noted in Announcing a new E-book, some say conservatives are the only real Christians. And such stick-in-the-mud Christians will likely object – e.g. – to calling the Old Testament the “Conservative Testament.” (That Jesus had to change, to bring up to date; see the notes.)
So – just in case some conservative Christian says anyone who believes in such things is “going to hell” – we can just quote 1st John 4:15: “Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God.” Also, as I’ve indicated before, in prior blogs:
If Jesus had been a conservative, we’d all be Jewish!
* * * *
An image from “Discovering the Jewish Jesus…”
* * * *
The “Twelfth Night” image is courtesy of A Twelfth Night Feast: ‘The King drinks’ c.1661 – rct.uk. The full blurb from the Royal Collection Trust (RCT) read: “JAN STEEN (LEIDEN 1626-LEIDEN 1679) A Twelfth Night Feast: ‘The King drinks’ c.1661 … Oil on panel | 40.4 x 54.5 cm (support, canvas/panel/str external) | RCIN 407489.”
Re: Christmas as “the birth of a new way to get closer to God.” You might even call the birth of Jesus the start of a whole New Testament, and thus what might be called the Liberal Testament. That is, the newer Testament designed “to attain the objects for which the instrument is designed and the purpose to which it is applied.” Which would be the Bible, and it’s goal of “saving” as many people as possible. See for example, 2 Peter 3:9, “The Lord isn’t slow to do what he promised, as some people think. Rather, he is patient for your sake. He doesn’t want to destroy anyone but wants all people to have an opportunity to turn to him and change the way they think and act.”
That would be as opposed to the Old Testament, or what might be called the “Conservative Testament.” See for example Strict constructionism – Wikipedia, which noted in part that “strictly literal interpretations” can lead to logically-deduced absurdities. (Leading in turn to the “doctrine of absurdity, which holds that common sense interpretations should be preferred over a “literal reading of a law or of original intent.”) On that note see Isaiah 66, “Whoever kills a bull is like someone who kills a person.” How many Bible literalists would support that interpretation today? Which leads us back to the standard notes (below), holding that “this blog takes issue with boot-camp Christians. They’re the Biblical literalists who never go ‘beyond the fundamentals.’”
Re: “If Jesus had been a conservative, we’d all be Jewish.” See Jesus: Liberal or Fundamentalist? To which might be added, “Not that there’s anything wrong with that.” See The Outing (Seinfeld) – Wikipedia, on the 57th episode of the sitcom, and it’s “popular catchphrase among fans.”
Re: Christmas as “something new under the sun.” That’s a reversal of Ecclesiastes 1:9, “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.” Which could be an apt metaphor for the whole idea of the Old Testament being conservative and the New Testament being liberal. Then again, it would be safe to say there has never been a president like Donald Trump. In case I’m being too subtle, he too is “something new under the sun…”
The lower image is courtesy of Discovering the Jewish Jesus – Israel – Jerusalem Post. The article – originally dated December 7, 2005 – began: “Jesus Christ is the most famous Jew of all time, but is today remembered as a Christian.” The article later added:
How odd that the Jews would accept a Christian version of one of their brethren rather than seeking to discover the man entombed beneath the myth. Like a mummy whose bandages must be removed, 2,000 years of Christian gauze must be stripped away so we may discover the Jewish Jesus. We may do so by reading the original story of Jesus in the New Testament, before it was modified by Pauline and Lucan editors… These Christian editors hid the real Jesus’ message of political revolution against Rome, thereby transforming him into a sound-bite-speaking do-gooder who loved the Romans and hated his people. THE REAL Jesus was a deeply religious Jewish patriot who despised the Romans for their cruelty to his people and for their paganism. He never once abrogated the laws of the Torah, and expressly condemned those who advocated doing so (Matt. 5:18).
See also Jesus – Wikipedia, which noted the Islamic view of Jesus: “A major figure in Islam, [He] is considered to be a messenger of God (Allah) and the Messiah (al-Masih) who was sent to guide the Children of Israel (Bani Isra’il) with a new scripture… Muslims regard the gospels of the New Testament as inauthentic, and believe that Jesus’ original message was lost or altered.” And finally, “Belief in Jesus (and all other messengers of God) is a requirement for being a Muslim. The Quran mentions Jesus by name 25 times—more often than Muhammad.” The image at left reads: “The name Jesus son of Mary written in Islamic calligraphy followed by Peace be upon him.”
* * * *
As noted in the opening blurb, this blog has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37, with the added, “Anyone who comes to Him.”) The second is that God wants us to live abundantly. (John 10:10.) The third is that we should do greater miracles than Jesus. (John 14:12). A fourth theme: The only way to do all that is read the Bible with an open mind:
…closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain’s natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a “search and destroy” relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people’s current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable… Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency…
So in plain words, this blog takes issue with boot-camp Christians. They’re the Biblical literalists who never go “beyond the fundamentals.” But the Bible can offer so much more than their narrow reading can offer… (Unless you want to stay a Bible buck private all your life…)
Now, about “Boot-camp Christians.” See for example, Conservative Christian – “Career buck private?” The gist of that post is that starting the Bible is like Army Basic Training. You begin by “learning the fundamentals.” But after boot camp, you move on to Advanced Individual Training.”
Also, and as noted in “Buck private,” I’d previously said the theme of this blog was that if you really want to be all that you can be, you need to go on and explore the “mystical side of Bible reading.*”
In other words, exploring the mystical side of the Bible helps you “be all that you can be.” See Slogans of the U.S. Army – Wikipedia, re: the recruiting slogan from 1980 to 2001. The related image at left is courtesy of: “toywonders.com/productcart/pc/catalog/aw30.jpg.”
* Re: “mystical.” As originally used, mysticism “referred to the Biblical liturgical, spiritual, and contemplative dimensions of early and medieval Christianity.” See Mysticism – Wikipedia, and the post On originalism. (“That’s what the Bible was originally about!”)
For an explanation of the Daily Office – where “Dorscribe” came from – see What’s a DOR?