* * * *
Welcome to “read the Bible – expand your mind:”
This blog has three main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live lives of abundance. (John 10:10.) The third is that God wants us to do even greater miracles than Jesus did. (John 14:12.)
And this thought ties them together:
In the meantime:
I should note first that Friday March 25 was the Feast of the “Annunciation.” That celebrates the day – nine months before Christmas – that the Virgin Mary “would conceive and become the mother of Jesus.” (See last year’s Annunciation “gets the ball rolling,” and also An Annunciation-Good Friday anamoly, which noted that in 2016 the Annunciation was celebrated on Good Friday; thus the anomaly, an “
* * * *
In plain words, when he wrote the Torah Moses was forced by circumstances “to use language and concepts that his ‘relatively-pea-brained contemporary audience’ could understand.’”
Moses was addressing an audience of the largely “unwashed” … illiterate men and women who had been trained since birth to be “mindless, docile slaves…” Suppose Moses had mentioned dinosaurs in his writings. Or how “we” revolve around that “big bright thing in the sky.” The result would have been similar to what nearly happened [in] Exodus 17:4, “Moses cried out to the LORD, ‘What should I do with these people? They are ready to stone me!’”
(See My “pain in the back.”) Which is one good reason why Moses wouldn’t have mentioned dinosaurs, or said things like “the earth we live on actually revolves around that ‘big bright thing in the sky.'” If he had told his contemporary audience such things he would have gotten stoned, burned at the stake or worse. (See On Moses getting stoned.)
Which is another way of saying that all the people who wrote the Bible had to keep in mind the human limitations of their audience. They were trying to put incomprehensible things into plain and simple language that even the most obtuse dolt could understand. Or to paraphrase Sir Kenneth Clark, the people who wrote the Bible had to have the intellectual power to make God comprehensible.
Which is no mean trick.
And which brings up one main theme of this blog: That reading the Bible means operating on at least two different planes. The first is the literal plane, the literal story of Jesus – which is so simple that even a child can understand it. But understanding the second plane requires more thought, more persistence, more work – and having more of an open mind.
Which is another way of saying that no one can ever know all there is to know about the Bible.
There will always be more to learn…
Which is pretty much the point the Apostle Paul – seen at right – was trying to make in Romans 6:19. (From one of the Daily Office Readings for Saturday, March 25.) In the New International Version the passage reads: “I am using an example from everyday life because of your human limitations.” In the International Standard Version: “I am speaking in simple terms because of the frailty of your human nature.”
“For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord. “As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.
Then too, Paul made pretty much the same point in Galatians 4:21-5:1, one of today’s New Testament Daily Office Readings. Specifically, in Galatians 4:24 he used an allegory. (The image at left shows a “Christian allegorical map of The Journey of Life.”)
Paul used this allegory – in Galatians 4:21-5:1 – to illustrate the difference between salvation through faith in Jesus and – reasonably interpreted – trying to achieve salvation through following the “letter of the law:”
Now this is an allegory: these women are two covenants. One woman, in fact, is Hagar, from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery… But the other woman [“Sarai,” or Sarah, the wife of Abraham] corresponds to the Jerusalem above; she is free, and she is our mother.
Which – you could say – is what the Bible does on a regular basis: Use “historical events as an illustration.” And then of course there’s the end of John’s Gospel, John 21:25: “Now there are also many other things that Jesus did. Were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.”
Only a small part of the actions of Jesus had been written… Enough is recorded to direct our faith, and regulate our practice… We may, however, look forward to the joy we shall receive in heaven, from a more complete knowledge of all Jesus did and said, as well as of the conduct of his providence and grace in his dealings with each of us.
Which seems to be a fact that many Biblical literalists seem to overlook. You begin your process of Bible-reading and study by “learning the fundamentals.” But then – after your spiritual boot camp – you’ll want to move on to more Advanced Individual Training, as noted below. That way – using an open-minded approach – you can get a head start on gaining a “more complete knowledge” of all that Jesus did and said, as well as a knowledge of the whole Bible itself.
And which brings up one final point for today:
“It was never ‘contrary to Scripture’ that the earth revolved around the sun. It was only contrary to a narrow-minded, pigheaded, too-literal reading of the Scripture…”
* * * *
Galileo facing the Inquisition, for saying the earth revolved around the sun…
* * * *
The full Daily Office Bible readings for Saturday, March 25, include: “AM Psalm 87, 90; PM Psalm 136; Jeremiah 13:1-11; Rom. 6:12-23; John 8:47-59.” See also The Annunciation: “AM: Psalm 85, 87; Isaiah 52:7-12; Hebrews 2:5-10 PM: Psalm 110:1-5(6-7), 132;Wisdom 9:1-12; John 1:9-14.” See also The Lectionary – Satucket Software Home Page.
The Kenneth Clark paraphrase is from the hardcover book version of Clark’s Civilisation (TV series). On pages 84-85 of the book, Clark compared the poet Dante with the painter Giotto. Then on page 85, Clark noted the differences between the two men, beginning with the fact that “their imaginations moved on very different planes.” But in the film version – and only in the film or TV version – Clark said Dante had “that heroic contempt for baseness that was to come again in Michelangelo. Above all, that vision of a heavenly order and the intellectual power to make it comprehensible.” Which is the phrase that drew my attention… See also Wikipedia, for more on the TV series.
The “allegory” image is courtesy of Wikipedia’s Allegorical interpretation of the Bible, referring to the:
…interpretive method (exegesis) which assumes that the Bible has various levels of meaning and tends to focus on the spiritual sense (which includes the allegorical sense, the moral (or tropological) sense, and the anagogical sense) as opposed to the literal sense. It is sometimes referred to as the Quadriga, a reference to the Roman chariot drawn by four horses.
The full caption for the map image reads: “Christian allegorical map of The Journey of Life, or an Accurate Map of the Roads, Counties, Towns &c. in the Ways to Happiness & Misery, 1775.”
Re: “Sarai,” or Sarah, the wife of Abraham. Wikipedia noted that she was “the wife and also the half–sister of Abraham and the mother of Isaac… According to Genesis 17:15, God ‘changed her name to Sarah as part of a covenant after Hagar bore Abraham his first son, Ishmael.'”
Galileo Galilei was brought before the Inquisition for heresy, but abjured his views and was sentenced to house arrest, under which he spent the rest of his life. Galileo was found “vehemently suspect of heresy,” namely of having held the opinions that the Sun lies motionless at the centre of the universe, that the Earth is not at its centre and moves, and that one may hold and defend an opinion as probable after it has been declared contrary to Holy Scripture. He was required to “abjure, curse and detest” those opinions. (E.A.)
Note that Galileo almost got burned at the stake – for saying the earth revolved around the sun – almost 3,000 after Moses was trying to lead his people to “the Promised Land…”
* * * *
As noted in the opening blurb, this blog has three main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live abundantly. (John 10:10.) The third is that God wants us to do even greater miracles than Jesus did. (John 14:12).
A fourth main theme is that the only way to do all that is read the Bible with an open mind:
…closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain’s natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a “search and destroy” relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people’s current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable… Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency…
So in plain words, this blog takes issue with boot-camp Christians. They’re the Biblical literalists who never go “beyond the fundamentals.” But the Bible can offer so much more than their narrow reading can offer… (Unless you want to stay a Bible buck private all your life…)
Now, about “Boot-camp Christians.” See for example, Conservative Christian – “Career buck private?” The gist of that post is that starting the Bible is like Army Basic Training. You begin by “learning the fundamentals.” But after boot camp, you want to move on to more Advanced Individual Training.
Also, and as noted in “Career buck private,” I’d previously written that the theme of this blog was that if you really wanted to be all that you can be, you need to go on and explore the “mystical side of Bible reading.*”
In other words, exploring the mystical side of the Bible helps you “be all that you can be.” See also Slogans of the United States Army – Wikipedia, re: the recruiting slogan from 1980 to 2001. The related image above left is courtesy of: “toywonders.com/productcart/pc/catalog/aw30.jpg.”
* Re: “mystical.” As originally used, mysticism “referred to the Biblical liturgical, spiritual, and contemplative dimensions of early and medieval Christianity.” See Mysticism – Wikipedia, and the post On originalism. (“That’s what the Bible was originally about!”)
For an explanation of the Daily Office – where “Dorscribe” came from – see What’s a DOR?