* * * *

* * * *
Welcome (back) to “read the Bible – expand your mind:”
The Book of Common Prayer says that by taking part in Holy Communion, Christians become “very members incorporate in the mystical body” of Jesus. The words “corporate” and “mystical” are key. They show that a healthy church has two sides, with the often-overlooked “mystic” side asking the question, “How do I experience God?” This blog tries to answer that.
It has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live lives of abundance.(John 10:10.) The third is that Jesus wants us to read the Bible with an open mind. (As Luke 24:45 says: “Then He [Jesus] opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.”) The fourth theme – another one often overlooked – is that Jesus wants us to do even greater miracles than He did. (John 14:12.)
And this thought ties them together:
The best way to live abundantly and do greater miracles than Jesus is: Read, study and apply the Bible with an open mind. For more see the notes or – to expand your mind – see the Intro.
In the meantime:
November 8, 2026 – Once again, this blog was out of circulation for months due to a techno-error on my part – see below – so I’ve been catching up. Meanwhile, when you look up “Dorscribe” you get dorscribe@aol.com, Author at DOR (etc.), to which I added this preamble:
For now you have to scroll down three or four items to get to this old post looking for “Dorscribe.” Why did that happen? As noted elsewhere, this blog was out of circulation from last July to October 24, mostly because I made a techno-error trying to add a “Donations” plug-in. The platform cut me off, leaving only a “fatal error” message in its wake. I hope to fix the situation in the future, but in the meantime you can click on the DORSCRIBE@AOL.COM link to see the latest post…
Now to the subject at hand. Over eight years ago – April 2018 – I posted “Trump-humping” – and Christians arguing with each other. In light of last Tuesday’s election it seemed reasonable to go back and review it. (Especially since the image above showed a prominent American who did “challenge the prevailing quacks.*”) There’s more on the Quacks below, but first that review.
It started in 2018 with an online article – now defunct – After NPR’s Embarrassment It’s Clear: We Need More Christians in Media. (They didn’t get their Easter facts straight.) Comments followed the main text and one wag wrote, “We [do] need more serious Christians – not Trump-humping evangelicals – in media.” That led to a response by a lady identified as Patriotmom: “The serious Christians I know would not call someone a ‘Trump-humping evangelical.’” I figured that was probably true: “‘Patriotmom’ probably didn’t associate with anyone in her inner circle who would ‘call someone a Trump-humping evangelical.’” But to me that raised a question: Could any serious or true Christian use the phrase “Trump-humping evangelical?”
For myself, I must confess – I do not deny, but confess – that I was very taken by the term “Trump-humping.” As a writer, “Trump-humping” strikes me as a great example of the literary device of assonance. (The “repetition of similar vowel sounds within a word, sentence, or phrase.”) Simply put, “Trump humping” rolls trippingly off the tongue.
I added that according to my reading of the Bible I do qualify as a True Christian: I cited Romans 10:9 – “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” I then added, “I have said and so believe.” (See also John 6:37, above.) Finally I pointed out what NPR’s Embarrassment actually said:
What is needed more than anything in the world of mass media today is a substantial influx of new reporters, journalists, and anchors who can speak intelligently about Christianity…
To that I said I couldn’t agree more: “we need good Christians who can conduct spirited debate on the fundamentals of the faith – without using the ‘you’e going to roast in hell’ card.” That led to the post’s first title, “Good Christians should argue with each other.” (In light of our adversary system – a basic tenet of America’s legal system – as the best way of arriving at “the truth.”) And that the reason good Christians should be able to argue with each other – intelligently and without pulling out the “roast in hell” card – is based on Deuteronomy 19:16-19:
If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse someone of a crime, the two people involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against a fellow Israelite, then do to the false witness as that witness intended to do to the other party.
In other words, if I tell someone I disagree with that he’s “going to roast in hell” for having an opinion different than mine, and he’s not – if I’m wrong – then I’ve just put myself in danger of roasting in hell. (Per Deuteronomy 19:16-19.) Now, about those Quacks.
The following quote is from H. L. Mencken’s Minority Report:
The only way that democracy can be made bearable is by developing and cherishing a class of men sufficiently honest and disinterested to challenge the prevailing quacks. No such class has ever appeared in strength in the United States. Thus the business of harassing the quacks devolves upon the newspapers. When they fail in their duty, which is usually, we are at the quacks’ mercy.
Columnist Russell Baker spoke in a similar vein, saying a reporter’s job is “to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.” But it turns out that’s also the job of a good Christian, “according to the likes of theologian Reinhold Niebuhr (1861-1918) and Baptist minister Walter Rauschenbusch.” That in turn is based on James 4:6: “God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble.” All of which could be a prime example of Hebrew poetry’s parallelism, saying the same thing with slightly different variations. (Or to be more precise, using “rhythmic repetition to create emphasis, beauty, and rhetorical force.”)
The point? Christians should ably argue with those of different opinions, be they fellow Christians or outside the Faith. That is, “give reasons or cite evidence in support of an idea, action, or theory, typically with the aim of persuading others to share one’s view.” And not resort to the name-calling so prevalent these days. (In Latin, ad hominem, “attacking the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent’s character or background.)
It’s sad to say but the most troubling and pervasive Prevailing Quacks these days include members of the current administration. (“Those people” as Robert E. Lee would say.)
On the plus side, there have been many prominent Christians willing to challenge those Quacks. See for example, Pope Leo urges US bishops to engage Trump: “Obviously, there’s some things going on in the [United] States that are of concern. We continue to look for ways to at least respond and raise some of the questions that need to be asked.” Also, “Discussing the Middle East, Leo criticized the lack of a clear U.S. response under Trump to ‘alleviate the suffering of the people, the innocent people in Gaza,'” an issue “obviously of great concern.”
See also Appeals court sides with Episcopal Church, interfaith partners in immigration enforcement lawsuit: “A federal appeals court panel has ruled in favor of The Episcopal Church and 26 ecumenical and interfaith partners in a lawsuit contesting the Trump administration’s removal of ‘sensitive locations’ protections for houses of worship in immigration enforcement.”
Then came last Tuesday. See e.g. ‘Defeated Goliath’: Did faith help Democrats flip key midterm races? The lead paragraphs mentioned Democrat James Talarico of Texas speaking after his surprise victory, with a large placard in front of him with the words, “Love Thy Neighbor.”
That message seemed to resonate with voters nationwide, who vastly backed Democrats in a sweeping series of victories that some saw as a humanitarian rejection of federal policies such as overly aggressive immigration enforcement, unauthorized war, efforts to stamp out diversity and economic measures that have left many families struggling… Religion proved pivotal at the ballot box nationwide.
And speaking of ecumenism – in the broader sense – Ohio’s Amy Acton was elected the state’s first Jewish and female governor, while a record seven Muslims were elected to Congress nationwide. Then – again – there was Pope Leo XIV, whose use of social media allowed his American followers to “see him as someone representing ‘a more accepting, open-arms version of Christianity.'” Then there was the “David against Goliath” aspect.
Make no mistake, lots of work remains for the next two years. (Since the Prevailing Quacks seem determined not to learn from mistakes.) But we’ll have guys like this on our side…
* * * *

* * * *
The upper image is courtesy of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. – Wikipedia. The caption: “1978 postage stamp issued by the U.S. Post Office to commemorate Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.” The image was also featured in the January 2018 post, “From Yahweh to Yahoo” – and the Great Dissenter.”
The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.
Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days: Celebrating the Church’s Calendar.
Re: The original 2018 “Trump-humping” post. I’ve updated and edited some of the original text for purposes of great clarity. (I hope.)
Re: Holmes and “Quacks.” He was known as “The Great Dissenter.”
Re: Trippingly off the tongue. See eNotes Shakespeare Quotes, which indicates the phrase – from Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 1–4 – was originally “trippingly on the tongue.” See also Wordnik: rolls-trippingly-off-the-tongue, about words that are just “fun to say.”
Re: Romans 10:9. But see Sirach 5:5, “Do not be so sure of forgiveness that you add sin to sin.” The Book of Sirach – also called Ecclesiasticus as opposed to Ecclesiastes – is the longest extant wisdom book from antiquity. It consists of ethical teachings not included in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament). It is is “an intertestamental text found in the Apocrypha,” though not considered canonical.
Russell Baker made his comment in a 1999 speech at Harvard.
The Mencken quote is from The Politics of Quackery (Atlantic magazine).
The lower image is courtesy of the Pope Leo urges US bishops article.
* * * *
As noted in the opening blurb, this blog has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (See John 6:37, with the added, “Anyone who comes to Him.”) This is a consistent theme throughout the Bible. From the Old Testament, Psalm 9:10, “You never forsake those who seek you, O Lord.” (In the Book of Common Prayer version.) The second is that God wants us to live abundantly. (John 10:10.) The third is that we should do greater miracles than Jesus. (John 14:12). A fourth theme: The only way to do all that is read the Bible with an open mind:
…closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain’s natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a “search and destroy” relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people’s current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable… Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency…
See also Splitting (psychology) – Wikipedia, on the phenomenon also called black-and-white thinking, “the failure in a person’s thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both positive and negative qualities of the self and others into a cohesive, realistic whole. It is a common defense mechanism. The individual tends to think in extremes (i.e., an individual’s actions and motivations are all good or all bad with no middle ground).
So in plain words, I take issue with what I call “Christian first graders.” Those who choose to stay in a kind of elementary-school first grade. See John the Baptist, ’24 – and “Christian First Graders,” for more. But the key point: “The Bible was designed to expand your mind,” not make it narrow. Also, there’s the idea that “Jesus was anything but negative. His goal was for you to grow and develop into all that you can be.” (For more on that see ABOUT THE BLOG, above.)
I’ve written on boot-camp Christians, the Literalists who never go “beyond the fundamentals.” But the Bible offers so much more than a narrow reading gives… (Unless you want to stay a buck private all your life…) Now, about “Boot-camp Christians” see Conservative Christian – “Career buck private?” The gist of that post: Starting the Bible is like Army Basic Training. You begin by“learning the fundamentals.” But after boot camp, you move on to Advanced Individual Training.”
And as noted in “Buck private,” one of this blog’s themes is that if you want to be all that you can be, you need to go on and explore the “mystical side of Bible reading.*” In other words, exploring the mystical side of the Bible helps you “be all that you can be.” See Slogans of the U.S. Army – Wikipedia, re: the recruiting slogan from 1980 to 2001.
Re: “mystical.” Originally the “liturgical, spiritual, and contemplative dimensions of early and medieval Christianity.” Mysticism – Wikipedia, and the post On originalism. (“What the Bible was originally about!”) See also Christian mysticism – Wikipedia, “In early Christianity the term ‘mystikos’ referred to three dimensions, which soon became intertwined, namely the biblical, the liturgical and the spiritual or contemplative… The third dimension is the contemplative or experiential knowledge of God.” As to that “experiential” aspect, see also Wesleyan Quadrilateral – Wikipedia, on the theological reflection method using four sources of spiritual development: scripture, tradition, reason, and “Christian experience.”
For an explanation of the Daily Office – where “Dorscribe” came from – see What’s a DOR?
* * * *


















