A review: “Challenge the prevailing Quacks…”

*   *   *   *

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., an American who “challenged the prevailing quacks…“

*   *   *   *

Welcome (back) to “read the Bible – expand your mind:”

The Book of Common Prayer says that by taking part in Holy Communion, Christians become “very members incorporate in the mystical body” of Jesus. The words “corporate” and “mystical” are key. They show that a healthy church has two sides, with the often-overlooked “mystic” side asking the question, “How do I experience God?” This blog tries to answer that.

It has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live lives of abundance.(John 10:10.) The third is that Jesus wants us to read the Bible with an open mind. (As Luke 24:45 says: “Then He [Jesus] opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.”) The fourth theme – another one often overlooked – is that Jesus wants us to do even greater miracles than He did. (John 14:12.) 

And this thought ties them together:

The best way to live abundantly and do greater miracles than Jesus is: Read, study and apply the Bible with an open mind. For more see the notes or – to expand your mind – see the Intro.

In the meantime:

November 8, 2026 – Once again, this blog was out of circulation for months due to a techno-error on my part – see below – so I’ve been catching up. Meanwhile, when you look up “Dorscribe” you get dorscribe@aol.com, Author at DOR (etc.), to which I added this preamble:

For now you have to scroll down three or four items to get to this old post looking for “Dorscribe.” Why did that happen? As noted elsewhere, this blog was out of circulation from last July to October 24, mostly because I made a techno-error trying to add a “Donations” plug-in. The platform cut me off, leaving only a “fatal error” message in its wake. I hope to fix the situation in the future, but in the meantime you can click on the DORSCRIBE@AOL.COM link to see the latest post…

Now to the subject at hand. Over eight years ago – April 2018 – I posted “Trump-humping” – and Christians arguing with each other. In light of last Tuesday’s election it seemed reasonable to go back and review it. (Especially since the image above showed a prominent American who did “challenge the prevailing quacks.*”) There’s more on the Quacks below, but first that review.

It started in 2018 with an online article – now defunct – After NPR’s Embarrassment It’s Clear:  We Need More Christians in Media. (They didn’t get their Easter facts straight.) Comments followed the main text and one wag wrote, “We [do] need more serious Christians – not Trump-humping evangelicals – in media.” That led to a response by a lady identified as Patriotmom:  “The serious Christians I know would not call someone a ‘Trump-humping evangelical.’” I figured that was probably true: “‘Patriotmom’ probably didn’t associate with anyone in her inner circle who would ‘call someone a Trump-humping evangelical.’” But to me that raised a question: Could any serious or true Christian use the phrase “Trump-humping evangelical?”

For myself, I must confess – I do not deny, but confess – that I was very taken by the term “Trump-humping.”  As a writer, “Trump-humping” strikes me as a great example of the literary device of assonance.  (The “repetition of similar vowel sounds within a word, sentence, or phrase.”)  Simply put, “Trump humping” rolls trippingly off the tongue.

I added that according to my reading of the Bible I do qualify as a True Christian: I cited Romans 10:9 – “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” I then added, “I have said and so believe.” (See also John 6:37, above.) Finally I pointed out what NPR’s Embarrassment actually said:

What is needed more than anything in the world of mass media today is a substantial influx of new reporters, journalists, and anchors who can speak intelligently about Christianity…

To that I said I couldn’t agree more: “we need good Christians who can conduct spirited debate on the fundamentals of the faith – without using the ‘you’e going to roast in hell’ card.” That led to the post’s first title, “Good Christians should argue with each other.” (In light of our adversary system – a basic tenet of America’s legal system – as the best way of arriving at “the truth.”) And that the reason good Christians should be able to argue with each other – intelligently and without pulling out the “roast in hell” card – is based on Deuteronomy 19:16-19:

If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse someone of a crime, the two people involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against a fellow Israelite, then do to the false witness as that witness intended to do to the other party. 

In other words, if I tell someone I disagree with that he’s “going to roast in hell” for having an opinion different than mine, and he’s not – if I’m wrong – then I’ve just put myself in danger of roasting in hell. (Per Deuteronomy 19:16-19.) Now, about those Quacks.

The following quote is from H. L. Mencken’s Minority Report:

The only way that democracy can be made bearable is by developing and cherishing a class of men sufficiently honest and disinterested to challenge the prevailing quacks. No such class has ever appeared in strength in the United States. Thus the business of harassing the quacks devolves upon the newspapers. When they fail in their duty, which is usually, we are at the quacks’ mercy.

Columnist Russell Baker spoke in a similar vein, saying a reporter’s job is “to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.” But it turns out that’s also the job of a good Christian, “according to the likes of theologian Reinhold Niebuhr (1861-1918) and Baptist minister Walter Rauschenbusch.” That in turn is based on James 4:6: “God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble.” All of which could be a prime example of Hebrew poetry’s parallelism, saying the same thing with slightly different variations. (Or to be more precise, using “rhythmic repetition to create emphasis, beauty, and rhetorical force.”)

The point? Christians should ably argue with those of different opinions, be they fellow Christians or outside the Faith. That is, “give reasons or cite evidence in support of an idea, action, or theory, typically with the aim of persuading others to share one’s view.” And not resort to the name-calling so prevalent these days. (In Latin, ad hominem, “attacking the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent’s character or background.) 

It’s sad to say but the most troubling and pervasive Prevailing Quacks these days include members of the current administration. (“Those people” as Robert E. Lee would say.)

On the plus side, there have been many prominent Christians willing to challenge those Quacks. See for example, Pope Leo urges US bishops to engage Trump: “Obviously, there’s some things going on in the [United] States that are of concern. We continue to look for ways to at least respond and raise some of the questions that need to be asked.” Also, “Discussing the Middle East, Leo criticized the lack of a clear U.S. response under Trump to ‘alleviate the suffering of the people, the innocent people in Gaza,'” an issue “obviously of great concern.”

See also Appeals court sides with Episcopal Church, interfaith partners in immigration enforcement lawsuit: “A federal appeals court panel has ruled in favor of The Episcopal Church and 26 ecumenical and interfaith partners in a lawsuit contesting the Trump administration’s removal of ‘sensitive locations’ protections for houses of worship in immigration enforcement.”

Then came last Tuesday. See e.g. ‘Defeated Goliath’: Did faith help Democrats flip key midterm races? The lead paragraphs mentioned Democrat James Talarico of Texas speaking after his surprise victory, with a large placard in front of him with the words, “Love Thy Neighbor.”

That message seemed to resonate with voters nationwide, who vastly backed Democrats in a sweeping series of victories that some saw as a humanitarian rejection of federal policies such as overly aggressive immigration enforcement, unauthorized war, efforts to stamp out diversity and economic measures that have left many families struggling… Religion proved pivotal at the ballot box nationwide.

And speaking of ecumenism – in the broader sense – Ohio’s Amy Acton was elected the state’s first Jewish and female governor, while a record seven Muslims were elected to Congress nationwide. Then – again – there was Pope Leo XIV, whose use of social media allowed his American followers to “see him as someone representing ‘a more accepting, open-arms version of Christianity.'” Then there was the “David against Goliath” aspect.

Make no mistake, lots of work remains for the next two years. (Since the Prevailing Quacks seem determined not to learn from mistakes.) But we’ll have guys like this on our side…

*   *   *   *

Pope Leo,”Citizen of the World,” and a man to challenge Prevailing Quacks…

*   *   *   *

The upper image is courtesy of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. – Wikipedia.  The caption:  “1978 postage stamp issued by the U.S. Post Office to commemorate Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.”  The image was also featured in the January 2018 post, “From Yahweh to Yahoo” – and the Great Dissenter.”

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days: Celebrating the Church’s Calendar.

Re: The original 2018 “Trump-humping” post. I’ve updated and edited some of the original text for purposes of great clarity. (I hope.)

Re: Holmes and “Quacks.” He was known as “The Great Dissenter.”

Re: Trippingly off the tongue. See eNotes Shakespeare Quotes, which indicates the phrase – from Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 1–4 – was originally “trippingly on the tongue.” See also Wordnik: rolls-trippingly-off-the-tongue, about words that are just “fun to say.” 

Re: Romans 10:9. But see Sirach 5:5, “Do not be so sure of forgiveness that you add sin to sin.” The Book of Sirach – also called Ecclesiasticus as opposed to Ecclesiastes – is the longest extant wisdom book from antiquity. It consists of ethical teachings not included in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament). It is is “an intertestamental text found in the Apocrypha,” though not considered canonical.

Russell Baker made his comment in a 1999 speech at Harvard.

The Mencken quote is from The Politics of Quackery (Atlantic magazine).

The lower image is courtesy of the Pope Leo urges US bishops article.

*   *   *   *

As noted in the opening blurb, this blog has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (See John 6:37, with the added, “Anyone who comes to Him.”) This is a consistent theme throughout the Bible. From the Old Testament, Psalm 9:10, “You never forsake those who seek you, O Lord.” (In the Book of Common Prayer version.) The second is that God wants us to live abundantly.  (John 10:10.) The third is that we should do greater miracles than Jesus. (John 14:12). A fourth theme: The only way to do all that is read the Bible with an open mind:

…closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain’s natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a “search and destroy” relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people’s current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable… Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency…

See also Splitting (psychology) – Wikipedia, on the phenomenon also called black-and-white thinking, “the failure in a person’s thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both positive and negative qualities of the self and others into a cohesive, realistic whole. It is a common defense mechanism. The individual tends to think in extremes (i.e., an individual’s actions and motivations are all good or all bad with no middle ground).

So in plain words, I take issue with what I call “Christian first graders.” Those who choose to stay in a kind of elementary-school first grade. See John the Baptist, ’24 – and “Christian First Graders,” for more. But the key point: “The Bible was designed to expand your mind,” not make it narrow. Also, there’s the idea that “Jesus was anything but negative. His goal was for you to grow and develop into all that you can be.” (For more on that see ABOUT THE BLOG, above.)

I’ve written on boot-camp Christians, the Literalists who never go “beyond the fundamentals.” But the Bible offers so much more than a narrow reading gives… (Unless you want to stay a buck private all your life…) Now, about “Boot-camp Christians” see Conservative Christian – “Career buck private?” The gist of that post: Starting the Bible is like Army Basic Training. You begin by“learning the fundamentals.” But after boot camp, you move on to Advanced Individual Training.”

And as noted in “Buck private,” one of this blog’s themes is that if you want to be all that you can be, you need to go on and explore the “mystical side of Bible reading.*” In other words, exploring the mystical side of the Bible helps you “be all that you can be.” See Slogans of the U.S. Army – Wikipedia, re: the recruiting slogan from 1980 to 2001.

Re: “mystical.” Originally the “liturgical, spiritual, and contemplative dimensions of early and medieval Christianity.” Mysticism – Wikipedia, and the post On originalism.  (“What the Bible was originally about!”) See also Christian mysticism – Wikipedia, “In early Christianity the term ‘mystikos’ referred to three dimensions, which soon became intertwined, namely the biblical, the liturgical and the spiritual or contemplative… The third dimension is the contemplative or experiential knowledge of God.” As to that “experiential” aspect, see also Wesleyan Quadrilateral – Wikipedia, on the theological reflection method using four sources of spiritual development: scripture, tradition, reason, and “Christian experience.”

For an explanation of the Daily Office – where “Dorscribe” came from – see What’s a DOR?

*   *   *   *

The Hallowe’en Triduum – 2026

*   *   *   *

“A graveyard outside a Lutheran church in Röke, Sweden on the feast of All Hallows…”

*   *   *   *

Welcome (back) to “read the Bible – expand your mind:”

The Book of Common Prayer says that by taking part in Holy Communion, Christians become “very members incorporate in the mystical body” of Jesus. The words “corporate” and “mystical” are key. They show that a healthy church has two sides, with the often-overlooked “mystic” side asking the question, “How do I experience God?” This blog tries to answer that.

It has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live lives of abundance.(John 10:10.) The third is that Jesus wants us to read the Bible with an open mind. (As Luke 24:45 says: “Then He [Jesus] opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.”) The fourth theme – another one often overlooked – is that Jesus wants us to do even greater miracles than He did. (John 14:12.) 

And this thought ties them together:

The best way to live abundantly and do greater miracles than Jesus is: Read, study and apply the Bible with an open mind. For more see the notes or – to expand your mind – see the Intro.

In the meantime:

October 27, 2026 – Once again, I apologize. Specifically, I apologize for how this blog came to be out of circulation from July to October due to a techno-error on my part. (See below.) As a result I had – and have – lots of catching up to do. In the meantime, when you look up “Dorscribe” you get dorscribe@aol.com, Author at DOR Scribe – Page 2 of 49, to which I added this:

For the time being you have to scroll down three or four items to get to this really old post when you try logging on to “Dorscribe.” And why did that happen? As noted elsewhere, this blog had been out of circulation from last July to October 24, mostly because I made a techno-error trying to add a “Donations” plug-in. The platform cut me off, leaving only a “fatal error” message in its wake. I hope to fix the situation in the future, but in the meantime you can click on the DORSCRIBE@AOL.COM link above to see the latest post…

But now, back to the subject at hand, the “Halloween Triduum.” It starts next Saturday night, October 31st. We call that night “Halloween,” but few know it’s just the first of three days called the Halloween “Triduum.” (A word meaning three days.) It’s also called Allhallowtide:

The word Allhallowtide was first used in 1471, and is derived from three words: the Old English word hallow, meaning ‘holy’, the word tide, meaning ‘time’ or ‘season’ [see Eastertide or Christmastide] and all (from Old English eall) meaning “every.” The latter part of the word Hallowmas is derived from the word Mass. The words hallow and saint are synonyms.

And speaking of Old English, its word for “saint” was halig, an adjective meaning holy or sacred. It eventually became “hallow” – as easier to say? – which led to the main triduum event, All Hallows’ Day, November 1. (What we now call “All Saints’ Day.”) And since the night before a big day is often called its evening or “eve” – think Christmas Eve – the full old-timey name for the night before November 1 was All Hallows’ Evening. (Or “Eve.”) In time that got shortened to All Hallows’ E’en, then to Hallows’ E’en – dropping the “all” – and finally just “Halloween.”

So much for etymology, but what about all those weird things people do on All Hallows’ E’en? And what’s it all about anyway? Is it just an excuse for wearing crazy costumes, getting lots of candy or watching really creepy movies, as so many seem to think? For starters, Wikipedia said the three days are times “to remember the dead, including martyrs, saints, and all faithful departed Christians.” The main day of the three is November 1st. We now call it All Saints Day, but way-earlier generations called it Hallowmas. It was established sometime between 731 and 741 – over 1,300 years ago – “perhaps by Pope Gregory III.”

Put another way, November 1 honors “all the saints and martyrs, both known and unknown.” In other words, special people in the Church. (A saint is defined as one “having an exceptional degree of holiness,” while a martyr is someone “killed because of their testimony of Jesus.”) On the other hand, November 2 – All Souls’ Day – was designed to honor “all faithful Christians … unknown in the wider fellowship of the church, especially family members and friends.’” In other words, the rest of us poor schmucks. (That is, those who have gone on before.) Also, consider this:

Given that many Christian cemeteries are interdenominational in nature, All Souls Day observances often have an ecumenical dimension, with believers from various Christian denominations praying together and cooperating to adorn graves.

Another note: The word ecumenism means even Christians in far different denominations “should work together to develop closer relationships” and promote Christian unity. (A crazy idea that would be a very nice change of pace for this year’s November 2.)

But again, what about all those strange “Eve of All Hallow’s” customs? It seems they started with the old-time idea that evil spirits were strongest during the long nights of winter. And that on the night of October 31 the “barriers between our world and the spirit world” were at their most permeable; the barrier between this world and the next was at is lowest point. Which brings up the masks and costumes that are a big part of Halloween. In the old days people wore masks or costumes to disguise their identities. The idea was to keep the ghosts or spirits – coming from the netherworld – “from recognizing live people in this ‘material world.’”

The same is true of bonfires; literally bonefires, fires where bones were burned. One idea? Evil spirits could be driven away with fire and noise. Also, old-timers thought the fires brought comfort to “souls in purgatory and people prayed for them as they held burning straw up high.”

Then there are those pumpkins. Some other old-time people set out carved pumpkins on their windowsills to keep “harmful spirits” out of their home. But yet another tradition said  jack-o’-lanterns “represented Christian souls in purgatory.” And while today jack-o’-lanterns are made from pumpkins, they were originally carved from large turnips.

In turn, both the jack-o’-lantern and Will-o’-the-wisp – the link has a weird Japanese interpretation – are tied in with the strange ghostly light known as ignis fatuus. (Medieval Latin for “foolish fire.”) That refers to the “atmospheric ghost light seen by travelers at night, especially over bogs, swamps or marshes. It resembles a flickering lamp and is said to recede if approached:”

Tradition had it that this ghostly light – seen by travelers at night and “especially over bogs, swamps or marshes – resembled a flickering lamp. The flickering lamp then receded if you approached it, and so it “drew travelers from their safe paths,” to their doom…

And about traveling on All Hallows E’en. (Holding a candle.) If you hiked from 11:00 p.m. until midnight, your had to be careful. If your candle kept burning, that was a good omen. (The traveler would be safe in the upcoming “season of darkness.”) But if the candle went out, “the omen was bad indeed.” (The thought was that the candle had been blown out by witches…)

But once again, the Halloween Triduum officially ends on November 2, All Souls’ Day. The idea iss to remember the souls of the dear departed, illustrated by the painting below. Good Christians remember deceased relatives on the day, and – in many churches – the following Sunday includes a memorial service for those who died in the past year. Which should make for the Good News of Halloween. Accordingly, here’s wishing you:

A Happy “All Hallow’s Triduum!”

*   *   *   *

The Three Days of Hallowe’en end on November 2, with All Souls’ Day …

*   *   *   *

The upper image is courtesy of Allhallowtide – Wikipedia, with the caption:  “A graveyard outside a Lutheran church in Röke, Sweden on the feast of All Hallows. Flowers and lighted candles are placed by relatives on the graves of their deceased loved ones.”

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days: Celebrating the Church’s Calendar.

The lower image is courtesy of All Souls’ Day – Wikipedia. The caption: “All Souls’ Day by William Bouguereau.”  See also Allhallowtide, and All Saints’ Day – Wikipedia. My original caption, from Triduum – 2019, was “The ‘Three Days of Halloween‘ end November 2, with All Souls’ Day.”

*   *   *   *

As noted in the opening blurb, this blog has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (See John 6:37, with the added, “Anyone who comes to Him.”) This is a consistent theme throughout the Bible. From the Old Testament, Psalm 9:10, “You never forsake those who seek you, O Lord.” (In the Book of Common Prayer version.) The second is that God wants us to live abundantly.  (John 10:10.) The third is that we should do greater miracles than Jesus. (John 14:12). A fourth theme: The only way to do all that is read the Bible with an open mind:

…closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain’s natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a “search and destroy” relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people’s current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable… Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency…

See also Splitting (psychology) – Wikipedia, on the phenomenon also called black-and-white thinking, “the failure in a person’s thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both positive and negative qualities of the self and others into a cohesive, realistic whole. It is a common defense mechanism. The individual tends to think in extremes (i.e., an individual’s actions and motivations are all good or all bad with no middle ground).

So in plain words, I take issue with what I call “Christian first graders.” Those who choose to stay in a kind of elementary-school first grade. See John the Baptist, ’24 – and “Christian First Graders,” for more. But the key point: “The Bible was designed to expand your mind,” not make it narrow. Also, there’s the idea that “Jesus was anything but negative. His goal was for you to grow and develop into all that you can be.” (For more on that see ABOUT THE BLOG, above.)

I’ve written on boot-camp Christians, the Literalists who never go “beyond the fundamentals.” But the Bible offers so much more than a narrow reading gives… (Unless you want to stay a buck private all your life…) Now, about “Boot-camp Christians” see Conservative Christian – “Career buck private?” The gist of that post: Starting the Bible is like Army Basic Training. You begin by“learning the fundamentals.” But after boot camp, you move on to Advanced Individual Training.”

And as noted in “Buck private,” one of this blog’s themes is that if you want to be all that you can be, you need to go on and explore the “mystical side of Bible reading.*” In other words, exploring the mystical side of the Bible helps you “be all that you can be.” See Slogans of the U.S. Army – Wikipedia, re: the recruiting slogan from 1980 to 2001.

Re: “mystical.” Originally the “liturgical, spiritual, and contemplative dimensions of early and medieval Christianity.” Mysticism – Wikipedia, and the post On originalism.  (“What the Bible was originally about!”) See also Christian mysticism – Wikipedia, “In early Christianity the term ‘mystikos’ referred to three dimensions, which soon became intertwined, namely the biblical, the liturgical and the spiritual or contemplative… The third dimension is the contemplative or experiential knowledge of God.” As to that “experiential” aspect, see also Wesleyan Quadrilateral – Wikipedia, on the theological reflection method using four sources of spiritual development: scripture, tradition, reason, and “Christian experience.”

For an explanation of the Daily Office – where “Dorscribe” came from – see What’s a DOR?

*   *   *   *


Back in business! Starting with St. Luke…

*   *   *   *

Saint Luke, as imagined by fellow artist El Greco (circa 1607)…

*   *   *   *

Welcome (back) to “read the Bible – expand your mind:”

The Book of Common Prayer says that by taking part in Holy Communion, Christians become “very members incorporate in the mystical body” of Jesus. The words “corporate” and “mystical” are key. They show that a healthy church has two sides, with the often-overlooked “mystic” side asking the question, “How do I experience God?” This blog tries to answer that.

It has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live lives of abundance.(John 10:10.) The third is that Jesus wants us to read the Bible with an open mind. (As Luke 24:45 says: “Then He [Jesus] opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.”) The fourth theme – another one often overlooked – is that Jesus wants us to do even greater miracles than He did. (John 14:12.) 

And this thought ties them together:

The best way to live abundantly and do greater miracles than Jesus is: Read, study and apply the Bible with an open mind. For more see the notes or – to expand your mind – see the Intro.

In the meantime:

October 25, 2026 – My apologies. This blog has been out of circulation since last July, mostly due to a techno-error on my part. I tried to add a “Donations” plug-in, and it cut off access, leaving only a “fatal error” message in its wake. Which means I have a lot of catching up to do, so I’ll start with the most recent feast day, the one for St. Luke, aka Luke the Evangelist.

His feast day – last October 18 – commemorates the man who wrote the third and last synoptic gospel. (See below.) The first one – Mark’s – was written “as early as the mid 50s.” (A.D.) Matthew’s came somewhere between 61 and 70 A.D. But most scholars say Luke wrote his Gospel some time later, between 71 and 80 A.D. And about those “synoptics:”

The gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are considered synoptic gospels on the basis of many similarities between them that are not shared by the Gospel of John. “Synoptic” means here that they can be “seen” or “read together…” The synoptic gospels are the source of many popular stories, parables, and sermons, such as Jesus’ humble birth in Bethlehem, the Sermon on the Mount, the Beatitudes, the Last Supper, and the Great Commission… The fourth gospel [John], presents a very different picture of Jesus and his ministry…

Isaac Asimov said Mark wrote for “the ordinary Christian of Jewish background” and Matthew for “those learned in Old Testament lore.” But Luke wrote his Gospel for Gentiles sympathetic to Christianity and considering conversion. Also, Luke treated Roman authorities more gently than the first two gospels, and Jesus Himself is shown as more sympathetic to Gentiles than in Matthew or Mark. Wikipedia added that Luke is “believed by many scholars to be a Greek physician who lived in the Greek city of Antioch in Ancient Syria.” The article added that going back as far as the early church fathers, Luke is considered to have written“both the Gospel according to Luke and the Acts of the Apostles.” (Originally one work called Luke-Acts.) Also:

Based on his accurate description of towns, cities and islands, as well as correctly naming various official titles, archaeologist Sir William Ramsay wrote that “Luke is a historian of the first rank [and] should be placed along with the very greatest of historians.” Professor of Classics at Auckland University, E.M. Blaiklock, wrote: “For accuracy of detail, and for evocation of atmosphere, Luke stands, in fact, with Thucydides. The Acts of the Apostles is not shoddy product of pious imagining, but a trustworthy record… it was the spadework of archaeology which first revealed the truth.”  New Testament scholar Colin Hemer [also attested to] the historical nature and accuracy of Luke’s writings. (Emphasis added.)

Scholars like archaeologist Sir William Ramsay said that in his accounts Luke accurately described towns, cities and islands, “as well as correctly naming various official titles.” Accordingly (he said), Luke is a “historian of the first rank [and] should be placed along with the very greatest of historians.” Then there’s E.M. Blaiklock, Professor of Classics at Auckland University:

“For accuracy of detail, and for evocation of atmosphere, Luke stands, in fact, with Thucydides. The Acts of the Apostles is not [a] shoddy product of pious imagining, but a trustworthy record… it was the spadework of archaeology which first revealed the truth.”

Another point: The article St. Luke: The Scribe of Christ’s Gentleness added that he “was the only Gentile to write books of the Bible.” Then too, Luke includes some distinct accounts demonstrating just how Jesus loved those “ungodly” who Paul mentioned in Romans 5:6:

Only in Luke do we hear the story of the Prodigal Son welcomed back by the overjoyed father. Only in Luke do we hear the story of the forgiven woman disrupting the feast by washing Jesus’ feet with her tears. Throughout Luke’s gospel, Jesus takes the side of the sinner who wants to return to God’s mercy… Reading Luke’s gospel gives a good idea of his character as one who loved the poor, who wanted the door to God’s kingdom opened to all, who respected women, and who saw hope in God’s mercy for everyone.

But Luke wasn’t just writer and historian, he was also an artist: “Christian tradition states that he was the first icon painter,” and that he “painted pictures of the Virgin Mary and Child.” He is said to have painted some 600 icons, including the “Black Madonna of Częstochowa and Our Lady of Vladimir. He was also said to have painted Saints Peter and Paul, and illustrate a gospel book with a full cycle of miniatures.“ So here’s to the multi-talented Luke the Evangelist, and Apostle, and historian of the highest order, and artist – not to mention a premier “scribe of Christ’s gentleness.”

*   *   *   *

Saint Luke painting the Virgin and Child, by Maarten van Heemskerck…

*   *   *   *

The upper image was originally courtesy of commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: El_Greco_-_St_Luke_-_WGA10577.jpg, which included the note: “El Greco portrayed the apostles with a powerfully expressive body language. This St Luke is from a cycle for the Toledo Cathedral… El Greco included St Luke in several of his [paintings of the Apostles] although Luke was not actually one of the twelve apostles. Here the artist provided the Western version of a subject he depicted in quite different terms during his period as an icon painter.”

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”

The Asimov quotes are from Asimov’s Guide to the Bible (Two Volumes in One),  Avenel Books (1981), at pages 912-15.

Romans 5:6: “For at just the right time, while we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly.”

The lower image is courtesy of File: Maarten van Heemskerck – St Luke Painting the Virgin, and/or “Wikimedia.”  See also Maarten van Heemskerck – Wikipedia, which noted that the artist (1498-1574) was a “Dutch portrait and religious painter, who spent most of his career in Haarlem,” and did the painting above in or about 1532.

*   *   *   *

As noted in the opening blurb, this blog has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (See John 6:37, with the added, “Anyone who comes to Him.”) This is a consistent theme throughout the Bible. From the Old Testament, Psalm 9:10, “You never forsake those who seek you, O Lord.” (In the Book of Common Prayer version.) The second is that God wants us to live abundantly.  (John 10:10.) The third is that we should do greater miracles than Jesus. (John 14:12). A fourth theme: The only way to do all that is read the Bible with an open mind:

…closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain’s natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a “search and destroy” relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people’s current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable… Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency…

See also Splitting (psychology) – Wikipedia, on the phenomenon also called black-and-white thinking, “the failure in a person’s thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both positive and negative qualities of the self and others into a cohesive, realistic whole. It is a common defense mechanism. The individual tends to think in extremes (i.e., an individual’s actions and motivations are all good or all bad with no middle ground).

So in plain words, I take issue with what I call “Christian first graders.” Those who choose to stay in a kind of elementary-school first grade. See John the Baptist, ’24 – and “Christian First Graders,” for more. But the key point: “The Bible was designed to expand your mind,” not make it narrow. Also, there’s the idea that “Jesus was anything but negative. His goal was for you to grow and develop into all that you can be.” (For more on that see ABOUT THE BLOG, above.)

I’ve written on boot-camp Christians, the Literalists who never go “beyond the fundamentals.” But the Bible offers so much more than a narrow reading gives… (Unless you want to stay a buck private all your life…) Now, about “Boot-camp Christians” see Conservative Christian – “Career buck private?” The gist of that post: Starting the Bible is like Army Basic Training. You begin by“learning the fundamentals.” But after boot camp, you move on to Advanced Individual Training.”

And as noted in “Buck private,” one of this blog’s themes is that if you want to be all that you can be, you need to go on and explore the “mystical side of Bible reading.*” In other words, exploring the mystical side of the Bible helps you “be all that you can be.” See Slogans of the U.S. Army – Wikipedia, re: the recruiting slogan from 1980 to 2001.

Re: “mystical.” Originally the “liturgical, spiritual, and contemplative dimensions of early and medieval Christianity.” Mysticism – Wikipedia, and the post On originalism.  (“What the Bible was originally about!”) See also Christian mysticism – Wikipedia, “In early Christianity the term ‘mystikos’ referred to three dimensions, which soon became intertwined, namely the biblical, the liturgical and the spiritual or contemplative… The third dimension is the contemplative or experiential knowledge of God.” As to that “experiential” aspect, see also Wesleyan Quadrilateral – Wikipedia, on the theological reflection method using four sources of spiritual development: scripture, tradition, reason, and “Christian experience.”

*   *   *   *

On Freedom Day – July 4, 2026

*   *   *   *

This painting, which dates from 1859, reimagines the toppling of the equestrian statue of George III in New York City.
King George falls in July 1776, after the “recently-penned Declaration of Independence .”

*   *   *   *

July 4, 2026 – Last year at this time I set out a hopeful mantra for the upcoming year; for this year, 2026: “I believe in Jesus Christ, the rule of law, and the Constitution.” (To be said in a rhythm something like that Kiefer Sutherland quote in A Few Good Men.)

I also had this thought: That the upcoming year “would be ever so much more enjoyable if the political party that thinks it’s more Christian would do their duty and make the first moves to becoming ministers of reconciliation.” (2d Corinthians 5:18: “all things are from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and gave us the ministry of reconciliation.”)

That didn’t happen, but today we’re talking about 2026 and America’s 250th Fourth of July Celebration. That brings up the painting at the top of the page, which included the thought that American history is no stranger to monument take-downs. “In early July 1776, American patriots gathered in New York City to hear for the first time a reading of the recently-penned Declaration of Independence.” And how did they respond? In New York City they marched over to a 4,000-pound statue of George III – the man who wanted to be King of America – and tore it down.

(Not that there’s any connection to current events or anything.)

And what was George’s sin, in the eyes of Americans who wanted life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Just that he expected top-down rule. He wanted to make all the rules and thought that his subjects – his abject servants – should meekly follow those orders. But after 150 years of carving their homes out of the wilderness and running their own show, Americans in 1776 wanted none of that. They had Improvised, Adapted and Overcome on their own. (“Thanks for nothing, George.”) They had survived and prospered – on their own – through years and years of often deadly competition with the perils of this strange but unforgiving New World.

Which is one reason the spirit of competition is such a crucial part of the American Way of Life.

And nothing represents healthy competition – the spirit of America – than baseball. “From the Civil War to Civil Rights and all points in between and beyond, the game of baseball reflects American life, from culture to economics and technological advances.” But now it’s much more. It’s become a way to break down barriers – a ministry of reconciliation – as shown by the World Baseball Classic. First held in 2006, tournaments come every three years, and the 2026 version featured 20 teams from around the world. That included teams from Great Britain, Israel, the Netherlands and Italy, which had a secret weapon. (An espresso machine in their dugout.)

And in those games, sometimes-mortal enemies – past and present in the outside world – compete together on a ball-field in a quintessentially American game. It’s become a worldwide phenomenon in which former arch-enemies from all over the world now play each other according to rules developed in mid-1800s America. And one critical aspect of baseball is sportsmanship, “fair and generous behavior or treatment of others,” not to mention “proper consideration for fairness, ethics, respect, and a sense of fellowship with competitors.”

(Compare: A “‘sore loser’ is one who takes defeat poorly. He hates competing on a level playing field.) And nothing represents a healthy respect for real competition in baseball than an exchange between Tommy Lasorda and Fulgencio Batista, the Cuban dictator. (Up to 1959.)

To set the stage, in the 1970s sportswriters began calling Tommy Baseball’s Goodwill Ambassador. “I was always preaching the gospel of baseball.” But he suspected part of the reason was also because “I’ve spent much of my baseball career outside the country.” He’d played, coached, managed or done exhibition games in Panama, Cuba, Canada, the Dominican Republic, Venezuela, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Japan and Italy.

Then one bright January morning in 1952 he was lying on a beach in Cuba, enjoying the sun when four burly men in dark suits walked up. “Get your clothes on. Come with us.” This came days after an in-game spat with Lorenzo Cabrera; after two of Lasorda’s pitches barely missed him, the third hit Cabrera squarely in the ribs. “Cabrera started toward Lasorda, bat in hand, and the two soon were swinging at each other.” Cabrera got ejected while Tommy was allowed to stay in the game. That outraged many Cubans, complete with death threats.

So Tommy was nervous sitting in the back seat of that black stretch limo for what seemed like hours. Eventually the car went through a large iron gate guarded by soldiers with machine guns. With the burly men in black escorting him, Tommy walked gingerly up the steps of a veranda; “perhaps forty men were there, sipping drinks.” And got introduced to Batista, “the first dictator I had ever met.” Who promptly apologized. “I’m very disappointed with Cabrera for coming after you… That’s not right. If he wanted to fight you, that’s part of baseball, but no, not with a bat.”

Even a dictator like Batista respected that in baseball at least, you respect the rules.

The fundamental reason for the popularity of the game is the fact that it is a national safety valve. [A] young, ambitious and growing nation needs to ‘let off steam.’ Baseball furnishes the opportunity… That is what baseball does for humanity. It serves the same purpose as a revolution in Central America or a thunderstorm on a hot day [: A] tonic, an exercise, a safety-valve, baseball is second only to Death as a leveler. So long as it remains our national game, America will abide no monarchy…

(Get that? “Abide no monarchy? Meaning who knows, maybe the spirit of baseball is the one thing left that can save this crazy, mixed-up country of ours through what has become our own version of The Troubles. Which brings up one Collect for this Independence Day:

“Lord God Almighty, in whose Name the founders of this country won liberty for themselves and for us, and lit the torch of freedom for nations then unborn: Grant that we and all the people of this land may have grace to maintain our liberties in righteousness and peace…”

(And while You’re at it, maybe send us another Goodwill Ambassador like Tommy Lasorda? We could use someone with his spirit of fair play, sportsmanship and respect for the rules …)

*   *   *   *

*   *   *   *

The upper image is courtesy of Ten Memorable Monument Takedowns in History. Some notes: The statue of King George was commissioned in 1766 to commemorate the repeal of the Stamp Act. But ten years later and in “defiance of the Crown, the mob tore down the statue and stripped it of its lead gild. The Continental Army later melted down George’s patina into 42,000 musket balls in a Connecticut foundry.” The full caption:

This painting, which dates from 1859, reimagines the toppling of the equestrian statue of George III in New York City. Erected in 1770, the statue featured the regent garbed in Roman military regalia on horseback, in the fashion of Marcus Aurelius.” The caption added that “It is doubtful that Native Americans, women and children were in attendance at this episode of iconoclasm by the Sons of Liberty.”

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”

For this post I reviewed On the Bible readings for July 4, 2014, and For Sunday of the July 4th weekend, also from 2014; along with On Independence Day, 2016, On Independence Day, 2018, July 4, 2024 – and a “What would have happened,” and – in large part – Independence Day 2025 – and a Call to Competition. (Also – for some reason – On my first full day in Jerusalem, from June 2019.)

Wikipedia says a mantra is “a sacred utterance, a numinous sound, a syllable, word or phonemes, or group of words (most often in an Indo-Iranian language like Sanskrit or Avestan) believed by practitioners to have religious, magical or spiritual powers.”

Re: On baseball’s importance to the American Way of Life, see Baseball History, American History and You | Baseball Hall of Fame. Also, American Way of Life: Meaning & History – Virtual Workers of America: Factors include Strong individualism, Love of freedom, Optimism & activity, the Pursuit of prosperity & wealth, and a sense of Justice & the right to equal opportunities.

See also Remembering Tommy Lasorda – NY Sports Day, “baseball’s goodwill ambassador, a man full of passion for his team, stories for his visitors and an appreciation for the game.” The story of him and Batista is in “The Artful Dodger” (Lasorda and Dave Fisher), Avon paperback, 1985.

Allen Sangree (c. 1878-1924) wrote the “abide no monarchy” quote.

The lower image is courtesy of  Remembering Tommy Lasorda.

*   *   *   *

Saints Peter, Paul and John – 2026

*   *   *   *

Salome, who beguiled her dad – Herod II – into beheading John the Baptist…

*   *   *   *

June 19, 2026 – Next Wednesday, June 24, is the feast day for the Nativity (Birth) of John the Baptist. The following Monday, June 29, is the feast day for remembering St. Peter and St. Paul, Apostles. Specifically, for remembering how they were both martyred in Rome at about the same time, and more specifically how their relics” – their bodily remains – were moved together to a safe place 200 years later, during another of several Roman persecutions.

Which means John comes first in this post, but I thought a title Peter, Paul and John would resonate with those of a certain age. (I.e., who actually remember Peter, Paul and Mary, the folk group “formed in New York City in 1961 during the American folk music revival.”)

That trio broke up in 1970 to pursue solo careers but then reunited in 1978. Their reunion tour was “so popular that the group decided to reunite more or less permanently in 1981,” and they continued recording and touring together until Mary died in 2009. But Saint John didn’t have such a happy end. (In the form of a reunion and continued popularity.) He fell victim to Salome, daughter of Herodias, who hated John. And so she got Salome to beguile her dad – Herod II – into beheading John the Baptist. But we’re getting ahead of ourselves.

The July 24 feast day celebrates the birth of John the Baptist, “who foretold the coming of the Messiah in the person of Jesus, whom he later baptised.” The readings include Isaiah 40:1-11, Psalm 85, Acts 13:14b-26, and Luke 1:57-80. Luke tells how Elizabeth – the cousin of Mary (mother of Jesus) – came to be a mother, and how her husband got struck dumb.

The time came for Elizabeth to give birth, and she bore a son. Her neighbors and relatives heard that the Lord had shown his great mercy to her, and they rejoiced…  [T]hey were going to name him Zechariah after his father. But his mother said, “No; he is to be called John.” They said to her, “None of your relatives has this name.” Then they began motioning to his father to find out what name he wanted to give him. He asked for a writing tablet and wrote, “His name is John…”

Note that Isaiah 40:1-11 – in the day’s readings – says in one translation of verse 3: “A voice cries out in the desert: ‘Clear a way for the LORD. Make a straight highway in the wilderness for our God.’” Thus, the Baptist became that voice in the wilderness, as noted in Matthew 3:3: This is he who was spoken of through the prophet Isaiah: “A voice of one calling in the wilderness, ‘Prepare the way for the Lord, make straight paths for him.’” Which is another way of saying John served as precursor, forerunner or advance man for Jesus. (As in, “News Flash:  Jesus is on the way!“) 

Turning to the other feast day, June 29 remembers Saints Peter and Paul, who died together. But the date itself recalls the day when – somewhere around 258 during the Valerian Persecution – what were believed to be the remains of the two were moved to prevent them from falling into the hands of the persecutors. In formal terms that was the “translation of their relics,” referring to the “ceremonial removal of holy objects from one place to another.” (Another note: They could not have been killed during the Valerian Persecution itself because they would have had to be over 200 years old.) Anyway, as Wikipedia noted:

The Feast of Saints Peter and Paul or Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul honors the martyrdom of the apostles … in Rome and is liturgically observed on 29 June. The celebration is of ancient Christian origin, the date selected being the anniversary of either their death or the translation of their relics. (Emphasis added.)

So the day does in part honor the martyrdom in Rome of the apostles Peter and Paul, but unfortunately, the Bible doesn’t give details about the deaths of either, “or indeed any of the Apostles except for James the son of Zebedee.” (See Acts 12:2.) But early tradition said they were martyred at Rome, at the command of the emperor and were buried there:

As a Roman citizen, Paul would probably have been beheaded with a sword. It is said of Peter that he was crucified head downward[. And thus as St. Augustine wrote,] “even though they suffered on different days, they were as one. Peter went first, and Paul followed. And so we celebrate this day made holy for us by the apostles’ blood…”

Of course they didn’t always agree. There was for example the Incident at Antioch, a dispute between them about how much Old Testament law binds Christians following the New Testament. (It’s a question – including that of requiring male circumcision – that remains unsolved “even to this day.”) But to me the main point of the Feast of Peter and Paul – together – is that it’s okay to have such differences of opinion among Christians. Or even to “squabble” from time to time. So, here’s to two scholars disputing but still managing to work together.

*   *   *   *

http://www.canvasreplicas.com/images/Two%20Scholars%20Disputing%20Peter%20and%20Paul%20Rembrandt%20van%20Rijn.jpg
“Scholars Disputing (Peter and Paul)” – but they still worked together… 

*   *   *   *

The upper image is courtesy of Salome – Wikipedia. The caption: “‘Salomé,’ by Henri Regnault (1870).” The article added that this Salome (III) was…

…a Jewish princess, the daughter of Herod II, who was the son of Herod the Great, with princess Herodias. She was granddaughter of Herod the Great, and stepdaughter of Herod Antipas. She is known from the New Testament, where she is not named, and from an account by Flavius Josephus. In the New Testament, the stepdaughter of Herod Antipas demands and receives the head of John the Baptist.

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”

Note also: Feast days falling on a Sunday get transferred to the next Monday. Precedence, Rules of – The Episcopal Church: “Sunday takes precedence over all other feasts and observances of the church year. When a feast of our Lord or other major feast appointed cannot be observed because it occurs on a Sunday, the feast is normally transferred to the first convenient open day in the following week.”

For this post I reviewed On the Nativity of John the Baptist – 2015, On Peter, Paul – and other “relics” (also from 2015), John the Baptist, Peter and Paul – 2016, On “John T. Baptist,” Peter and Paul – 2021, John the Baptist, ’24 – and “Christian First Graders,” and Nativity of St. John the Baptist – 2025.

The lower image is courtesy of Two Scholars Disputing by REMBRANDT Harmenszoon … (web gallery of art.) The explanatory section added that the most likely explanation of the painting is that it “represents St Peter and St Paul in conversation,” or even Argument:

Rembrandt omits the attributes by which the two apostles were traditionally identified, he relies only on their physical characteristics … and on what they are seen to be doing, that is earnestly discussing a text which the one (St Peter) is explaining to the other.

See also the painting courtesy of Saints Peter and Paul by GRECO, El – Web Gallery of Art:

The two saints[,] the most influential leaders of the early Church[, are shown here] engaged in an animated discussion.  The older, white-haired Peter … inclines his head thoughtfully to one side as he looks towards the text being expounded.  In his left hand he holds his attribute, the key to the kingdom of Heaven.  His right hand is cupped as if weighing up an idea.  Paul presses his left hand down firmly on the open volume on the table, his right hand raised in a gesture of explanation as he looks directly at the viewer.

The article noted that El Greco painted the two together several times “with remarkable consistency.” Peter always has white hair and a beard, while “Paul is always shown slightly balding, with dark hair and beard, wearing a red mantle…” See also Feast of Peter and Paul – Wikipedia, with caption: “Saint Peter and Saint Paul. Oil on canvas by El Greco. circa 16th-century. Hermitage Museum, Russia.”

*   *   *   *

On St. Barnabas 2026 – A “model for ministry?”

*   *   *   *

“Paul and Barnabas Taken for Gods” – after Paul got his Second Chance…

*   *   *   *

June 14, 2026 – June 11 was the Feast Day for Saint Barnabas. Though not one of the original 12, he is regarded as one of the first 72 disciples, and at that he was a “most respected man in the early Church after the Apostles themselves.” As one of Christ’s earliest followers he was also responsible for welcoming Paul into the Church. (Despite serious fears and misgivings.)

Aside from the Twelve, few others receive the designation of apostle in the New Testament. Chief among them is the apostle Paul. Among the others is his one-time collaborator Barnabas, whose memorial is celebrated by the Church on June 11.

Barnabas is first mentioned in Acts 4:36: “Joseph, a Levite, born in Cyprus, whom the apostles called Barnabas (son of encouragement), sold a field he owned, brought the money, and turned it over to the apostles.” As to Paul, the website Barnabas the Apostle added that even after his Damascus Road Experience, most Christians in Jerusalem “wanted nothing to do with him. They had known him as a persecutor and an enemy of the Church. But Barnabas was willing to give him a second chance.” (Which is pretty much what Jesus is all about…)

In short, if it hadn’t been for Barnabas willing to give Paul a second chance – Paul, once a zealous persecutor of early Christians – he might never have become that Church’s most important early convert. (If not “the Founder of Christianity,” after Jesus of course.) But then came an ironic twist, after Barnabas gave that new “Apostle Paul” his Second Chance:

Paul and Barnabas went on a missionary journey together, taking Mark with them. Part way, Mark turned back and went home. When Paul and Barnabas were about to set out on another such journey, Barnabas proposed to take Mark along, and Paul was against it, saying that Mark had shown himself undependable. Barnabas wanted to give Mark a second chance [again] and so he and Mark went off on one journey, while Paul took Silas and went on another. Apparently Mark responded well to the trust given him by the “son of encouragement,” since we find that Paul later speaks of him as a valuable assistant (2 Timothy 4:11; see also Colossians 4:10 and Philemon 24).

So we could call Barnabas “the Apostle of Second Chances.” (On that note, June ’24, St. Barnabas and second chances discussed Purgatory as a second chance we may have, compared to the “pass-fail” theory advanced by some. My feeling: “I’ll take all the help I can get.”)

The bottom line: The early Church benefited greatly because Barnabas gave both Paul and Mark a second chance, and if only for that we celebrate his life on June 11. But there’s another factor: The feast day for St. Barnabas always falls just five days after June 6, when we remember the sacrifices made on D-Day in 1944. (A “key turning point in World War II.”)

Which raises a dilemma. Can good Christians take part in an armed conflict, “characterized by widespread violence, destruction, and mortality?” (Like what took place on D-Day, on a vast scale.) St. Augustine for one thought we could, depending on circumstances of course. Which is why he and others developed a system of military ethics “to ensure that a war is morally justifiable through a series of criteria, all of which must be met for a war to be considered just. It has been studied by military leaders, theologians, ethicists and policymakers.”

One short answer? Consider it not unlike the Blessing of a Marriage: “Not to be entered into unadvisedly or lightly, but reverently, deliberately, and in accordance with” – in this case – criteria set out by St. Augustine and others after him. (To insure the violence is indeed “justified.”) That’s something our political leaders would do well to keep in mind before putting our young people – the one hope for our future – “in harm’s way.” But what is your duty if you think your country’s leaders are sending our young people to war “unadvisedly and lightly?”

Some people in power love to cite Hebrews 13:17 as support from the Bible for their saying that you should just take them at their word: “Have confidence in your leaders and submit to their authority, because they keep watch over you as those who must give an account. Do this so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no benefit to you.”

Which may have been true enough when Hebrews was written. (Circa 63 A.D.) Kings ruled, almost always (sometimes queens), and almost always their subjects had no say whatever in how they would be ruled. But these days we have “something new under the sun.” (Qoheleth.)

The opening words of the [United States] Constitution settle who holds supreme authority: “We the People of the United States…do ordain and establish this Constitution.”1 The government did not create itself. The people created it, gave it a defined set of powers, and kept everything else. That framing makes the United States government a delegated agent, not a sovereign in its own right.

Which is a subject I’ll address in greater length in the post covering the July 4th weekend coming up. (And after posts covering the upcoming feast days for the Nativity of St John, the Baptist on June 24, and St Peter and St Paul, Apostles on June 29.)

In the meantime, for more on this saint see Barnabas – Wikipedia, including information on how some early Christians considered him the author of the Hebrews, and how he is now the patron saint of Cyprus, and how he was eventually martyred. (Stoned to death, or bound with a rope around his neck, then dragged to the site where he would be burned to death?) Which can lead to the conclusion that standing up for Jesus, the rule of law and the American way of Life can still be a risky business. (Up to and including the risks of saying out loud that you think your country’s leaders are sending our young people to war “unadvisedly and lightly?”)

*   *   *   *

A question while celebrating Freedom Day ; St. Augustine, and “is it a ‘Just war?’“

*   *   *   *

The upper image is courtesy of St. Barnabas in Art – Christian Iconography, with text: “In Acts 14:8-18 Paul and Barnabas in Lystra heal a crippled man and the Lystrans take them for gods. A priest even brings an ox to sacrifice to them, as shown in this painting. The two have to explain that ‘we are of the same nature as you.'” See also “St. Barnabas: The Forgotten Apostle? – Simply Catholic, which provided some of the text including the “model for ministry” part.

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”

Note also: Feast days falling on a Sunday get transferred to the next Monday. Precedence, Rules of – The Episcopal Church: “Sunday takes precedence over all other feasts and observances of the church year. When a feast of our Lord or other major feast appointed cannot be observed because it occurs on a Sunday, the feast is normally transferred to the first convenient open day in the following week.”

For this post I reviewed 2014’s St. Barnabas, On the DORs for June 6, 2015, D-Day and St. Barnabas – 2021, June ’24, St. Barnabas and second chances, and Pentecost and St. Barnabas – 2025.

“In Harm’s Way.” There is of course that 1965 John Wayne movie (directed by Otto Preminger) but for the original see John Paul Jones – Wikiquote: “I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harm‘s way.”

For more on the “opening words” see What Is American Sovereignty Under the Constitution?

The lower image is courtesy of Just war theory – Wikipedia: “The purpose of the doctrine is to ensure that a war is morally justifiable through a series of criteria, all of which must be met in order for a war to be considered just.” For more information google “Christianity and just war theory.”

*   *   *   *

On Trinity Sunday and the Visitation – 2026

*   *   *   *

The hand represents the Father, the ichthys the Son, and the dove represents the Holy Spirit…

*   *   *   *

June 4, 2026 – Last Sunday, May 31, would have been a busy day. Both Trinity Sunday – the first Sunday after Pentecost, 56 days after Easter Sunday – and also the Day to remember the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin both fell on that day. But because the Visitation did fall on a Sunday, it got transferred to Monday, June 1. And now for some specifics about “Trinity:”

Trinity Sunday celebrates the Christian doctrine of the Trinity, the three Persons of God: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit… The Sundays following Pentecost, until Advent, are numbered from this day.  In traditional Catholic usage, the First Sunday After Pentecost is on the same day as Trinity Sunday…  [T]he Episcopal Church in the United States of America (ECUSA) now follows the Catholic usage…

(Trinity Sunday – Wikipedia.) Also, this feast day is one of the few in the Christian Calendar to celebrate “a reality and doctrine rather than a person or event.” The idea of the Trinity is both fascinating, controversial and difficult to understand; a mystery. But by mystery “the Church does not mean a riddle,” but rather a reality above human comprehension. (So hard to understand that even a smart guy like Thomas Jefferson couldn’t make sense of it, as noted below.) On the other hand, it’s been said that the mystery of the Trinity “is not a wall to run up against, but an ocean in which to swim.” (All About Trinity Sunday | Prayers, History, Customs.)

As for Jefferson, he referred to the doctrine as a “Three-headed Monster.” (For the full quote see Thomas Jefferson quote.) But it seems to me that while Jefferson was really smart, he fell into the common error of “thinking that he could ever really understand everything there is to know about God.” (He was much like Nicodemus, in taking the Bible “way too literally.”) 

See also What does the Bible teach about the Trinity? – GotQuestions.org:

The most difficult thing about the Christian concept of the Trinity is that there is no way to completely understand it or explain it. God is infinitely greater than we are; therefore, we should not expect to be able to fully understand Him. 

There’s lots more to read in the link, but you get the idea. (Or do you?)

Moving on the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. (The formal name.) Wikipedia noted:

The Visitation is the visit of Mary with Elizabeth as recorded [in] Luke 1:39–56.  It is also the name of a Christian feast day[,] celebrated on 31 May…  Mary is pregnant with Jesus and Elizabeth is pregnant with John the Baptist.  Mary left Nazareth immediately after the Annunciation and went “into the hill country” [of Judah] to attend to her cousin.

Wikipedia added, “In the Gospel of Luke, the author’s accounts of the Annunciation and Visitation are constructed using eight points of literary parallelism to compare Mary to the Ark of the Covenant.” (Which I didn’t know.) Also, Mary’s Magnificat echoes Old Testament passages including the Song of Hannah, in 1st Samuel 2:1-10. There’s more background in Visitation – 2016, but here’s the main point: On May 31 we celebrate the early meeting of Mary and her cousin Elizabeth. “Their meeting sets the stage for all that will come later, and it is women who recognize it first.” (See also Mary Magdalene, “Apostle to the Apostles.”)

More to the point, when Mary visited Elizabeth, “John the Baptist, still unborn, leaped for joy in his mother’s womb.” Meaning the two women, one seemingly too old, would bear John, “the last prophet of the Old Covenant.” Her cousin Mary, a virgin not ready to have a child, was “destined to bear the One Who was Himself the beginning of the New Covenant.”

*   *   *   *

Representing the transition from the Old to the New Covenant…

*   *   *   *

The upper image was first courtesy of Trinity – Wikipedia. Caption: “An artistic depiction of the Trinity, with the hand representing the Father, the ichthys representing the Son, and the dove representing the Holy Spirit.

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”

Note also: Feast days falling on a Sunday get transferred to the next Monday. Precedence, Rules of – The Episcopal Church: “Sunday takes precedence over all other feasts and observances of the church year. When a feast of our Lord or other major feast appointed cannot be observed because it occurs on a Sunday, the feast is normally transferred to the first convenient open day in the following week.”

For this post I reviewed On Trinity Sunday, 2015, On Trinity Sunday (2016) – and more, and 2018’s The Trinity – Jefferson’s “3-headed monster.” Also, On the Visitation – 2016, Mary’s Visitation – and Pentecost – 2017, and Mary’s Visitation and Jefferson’s Monster – 2023.

The lower image is courtesy of Images, “the visitation of the blessed virgin Mary.”

*   *   *   *

On Pentecost Sunday – 2026

*   *   *   *

“Commemorating the descent of the Holy Spirit“ – on the very first Pentecost Sunday…

*   *   *   *

May 26, 2026 –  Last year, Pentecost Sunday came in June, three days before the feast for St. Barnabas – “Apostle of Second Chances” – on the 11th. This year it came on May 24, eight days before we celebrate the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. (It’s normally seven days, but the 2026 “Visitation” comes on a Sunday, and so will be transferred to the following Monday.)

And speaking of delay, I couldn’t do this post sooner because I just got back from two weeks in Ireland last Thursday, May 21, and am still trying to get back up to speed. But back to Pentecost, from the Greek word for “50th day.” It always comes 50 days after Easter Sunday. (Or seven weeks and a day.) And it’s been around a long, long time. See Pentecost – Wikipedia:

Pentecost is the Greek name for the Feast of Weeks, a prominent feast in the calendar of ancient Israel celebrating the giving of the Law on Sinai. This feast is still celebrated in Judaism as Shavuot. Later, in the Christian liturgical year, it became a feast commemorating the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles and other followers of Jesus Christ … as described in the Acts of the Apostles [verses 1-13 et seq.].

In other words, it’s been around for well over 2,000 years.

Other notes: It commemorates the day the Holy Spirit descended on the Apostles and other followers of Jesus, who were in Jerusalem to celebrate the Jewish Feast of Weeks. For a full account of the event see Acts of the Apostles 2. Or for a summary see Acts of the Apostles 2. (Bible Hub: “Verses 37–41 – Three Thousand Receive the Word,” and “Verses 42–47 – A Spirit-Filled Community Forms.” All of which is why this day is called the Birthday of the Church. (As I’ve cited, “from an historical point of view, Pentecost is the day on which the church was started.”)

Before the events of the first Pentecost … a few weeks after Jesus’ death and resurrection, there were followers of Jesus, but no movement that could be meaningfully called “the church.”  Thus, from an historical point of view, Pentecost is the day on which the church was started.  This is also true from a spiritual perspective, since the Spirit brings the church into existence and enlivens it.  Thus Pentecost is the church’s birthday.

(See Patheos.) But another name for the day is Tongue Sunday. For one thing there were the “tongues of fire” that appeared, as shown in the El Greco painting above. (Acts 2:3.) For another thing there was “speaking in tongues” – glossolalia – that became a big part of the first Pentecost Sunday. Acts 2:4: “All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.” That made some onlookers skeptical, even at the time. 

As noted in Acts 2:12 and 13, some who saw the event were amazed, but “others sneered and said, ‘They are filled with new wine!’” But the Apostles weren’t babbling. (The “sound of people talking simultaneously,” or talking “rapidly and continuously in a foolish, excited, or incomprehensible way,” or uttering meaningless or foolish words or sounds.) Instead, they spoke in concrete known languages, and not just the prevailing Koine Greek and disciples’ own Aramaic. People from many different nations could understand them. Acts 2, verse 8-11:

“How is it that we hear, each of us, in our own native language? Parthians, Medes, Elamites, and residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya belonging to Cyrene, and visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabs – in our own languages we hear them speaking about God’s deeds of power.”

(But see also 1st Corinthians 14:19, on the potential abuse of that gift. The Apostle Paul said while he was glad he could speak in tongues, in church “I would rather speak five intelligible words to instruct others than ten thousand words in a tongue.”)

Another thing Pentecost Sunday does is mark the beginning of “Ordinary Time,” as it’s called in the Catholic Church, and shown in the chart below. That Ordinary Time takes up over half the church year, though in the Episcopal Church and other Protestant denominations, it goes by another name. That is, in the Anglican liturgy it’s called the Season after Pentecost and it begins on the Monday after Pentecost Sunday and goes on “through most of the summer and autumn.” So, this year the Season after Pentecost – or Ordinary Time – runs from Monday, May 25, through Sunday, November 29, the First Sunday of Advent.

So, looking ahead to a long Pentecost Season, here’s wishing a Happy Birthday, Church!

*   *   *   *

“Ordinary Time” – Pentecost Season – can take up half the Church year…

*   *   *   *

The upper image was first courtesy of Pentecost Sunday Images – Image Results. But see also El Greco – Pentecost, 1610 at Prado Museum Madrid Spain. The caption – gleaned from past posts – is from Wikipedia, in turn gleaned from the following: “The Christian High Holy Day of Pentecost is celebrated on the 50th day (the seventh Sunday) from Easter Sunday. It commemorates the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles and other followers of Jesus Christ while they were in Jerusalem celebrating the Feast of Weeks, as described in the Acts of the Apostles (Acts 2:1–31).”

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”

Note also: Feast days falling on a Sunday get transferred to the next Monday. Precedence, Rules of – The Episcopal Church: “Sunday takes precedence over all other feasts and observances of the church year. When a feast of our Lord or other major feast appointed cannot be observed because it occurs on a Sunday, the feast is normally transferred to the first convenient open day in the following week.”

For this post I reviewed 2015’s On Pentecost – “Happy Birthday, Church,” Pentecost 2020 – “Learn what is pleasing to the Lord,” On Pink Floyd – and Pentecost Sunday, 2021, On Pentecost Sunday – 2024, and On Pentecost and St. Barnabas – 2025.

The lower image is courtesy of Liturgical year – Wikipedia. See also Ordinary Time – Wikipedia.

*   *   *   *

Saints Philip and James – 2026

*   *   *   *

Saints Philip and James the Lesser – together in the “Basilica of the 12 Holy Apostles…*” 

*   *   *   *

April 30, 2026 – Friday, May 1, is the Feast Day for St. Philip and St. James. (The link is to the 2020 meditation on these two, with a note: “we are now in the eighth full week of the COVID-19 pandemic. And since wisdom begins with the definition of terms – said Socrates – I’ll clarify. To me, the pandemic hit full swing – the “stuff really hit the fan” – back on Thursday, March 12.”

But we digress. We have other fish to fry these days. So, back to Saints Philip and James. One problem is, we’re not sure who they are. “James” was a popular and widespread name in Jesus’ time. It was associated with Jacob, who became “Israel” by wresting with the angel in Genesis 32:24-32. The English name “James” is a variant of “Jacob,” or in Hebrew, “Ya’akov.” And the New Testament lists at least three “James” who could fit the bill, and possibly as many as eight.

Our best guess is that the James remembered on May 1 is James the Lesser, also called James the Son of Alphaeus. (Not to be confused with James the Greater, called “James the Elder.”) This lesser James “appears only four times in the New Testament, each time in a list of the twelve apostles.” But he gets his own feast day, as does St. Philip.

The best guess here is that this Philip is Philip the Apostle, but there was also a Philip the Deacon: “One of the seven men chosen by the Apostles to perform certain administrative tasks for the poor in the early Christian community at Jerusalem (Acts 6:5-7). Because of his zeal in preaching the gospel he became known as Philip the Evangelist (Acts 21:8).”

But again, our best guess is that the Philip remembered on May 1 is Philip the Apostle. Wikipedia said this Philip was a disciple from Bethsaida, and that Andrew and Peter were from the same town. Jesus tested him in John 6:6, and later he and Andrew told Jesus about some Greeks who wanted to see Him in John 12:20-22. And as noted, Wikipedia distinguished this Philip from “Philip the Deacon.” See Philip the Evangelist – Wikipedia: “He preached and performed miracles in Samaria, and met and baptised [sic] an Ethiopian man, a eunuch, on the road from Jerusalem to Gaza, traditionally marking the start of the Ethiopian Church (Acts 8:26–39).”  (Confused? In past posts I’ve been confused as well.)

As to why these two saints are celebrated together:

The two apostles Philip and James the Lesser are remembered with a single liturgical feast because their relics, transferred respectively from Hierapolis and Jerusalem, were placed together in the Basilica of the Twelve Holy Apostles [“Santi Apostoli“] in Rome.

Another note on this Philip. He was a link to the Greek community. He had a Greek name, could speak Greek, probably knew the Greek pilgrims in Jerusalem, as shown by is advising Andrew “that certain Greeks wish to meet Jesus.” (John 12:21.) Also, during the Last Supper, “when Philip asked Jesus to show them the Father, he provides Jesus the opportunity to teach his disciples about the unity of the Father and the Son.” (And we could use some of that unity today.)

*   *   *   *

‘St. Philip,’ by Peter Paul Rubens,” circa 1611…

*   *   *   *

The upper image is courtesy of Saints Philip and James – Franciscan Media. Caption: “Image: Detail of reredos | Polytych by Maestà | Wikimedia.” See also “Santi Apostoli, Rome.” The article noted this “6th-century Roman Catholic parish and titular church and minor basilica in Rome, Italy, dedicated originally to St. James and St. Philip whose remains are kept here, and later to all Apostles. 

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”

For this post I reviewed, from 2016, Philip and James – Saints and Apostles, On St. Philip and St. James – May, 2020, from 2022, Here’s to Saints Philip and James – “Whoever you are,” and On Saints Mark, Philip and James – 2023.

The lower image is courtesy of Philip the Apostle – Wikipedia. Caption: “‘St. Philip,’ by Peter Paul Rubens, from his ‘Twelve Apostles’ series (c. 1611), at the Museo del Prado, Madrid.”

*   *   *   *

On Saint Mark – 2026

*   *   *   *

St. Mark, second from the right.  (His symbol – a lion – sleeps in the right foreground…) 

*   *   *   *

Welcome to “read the Bible – expand your mind:”

The Book of Common Prayer says that by taking part in Holy Communion, Christians become “very members incorporate in the mystical body” of Jesus. The words “corporate” and “mystical” are key. They show that a healthy church has two sides, with the often-overlooked “mystic” side asking the question, “How do I experience God?” This blog tries to answer that.

It has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live lives of abundance.(John 10:10.) The third is that Jesus wants us to read the Bible with an open mind. (As Luke 24:45 says: “Then He [Jesus] opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.”) The fourth theme – another one often overlooked – is that Jesus wants us to do even greater miracles than He did. (John 14:12.) 

And this thought ties them together:

The best way to live abundantly and do greater miracles than Jesus is: Read, study and apply the Bible with an open mind. For more see the notes or – to expand your mind – see the Intro.

In the meantime:

April 25, 2026 – Today is the Feast Day for Saint Mark, who wrote the first and shortest of the four Gospels. “In Christian tradition, Mark the Evangelist, the author of the second gospel is symbolized by a lion – a figure of courage and monarchy.” (Wikipedia.) But that “second Gospel” doesn’t mean his wasn’t the first account of the life of Jesus. As Isaac Asimov noted:

Matthew is [listed as the] first of the gospels in the New Testament because, according to early tradition, it was the first to be written. This, however, is now doubted by nearly everyone. The honor of primacy is generally granted to Mark, which is the second gospel in the Bible as it stands.

The writer of this first-in-time Gospel is generally identified as the same John Mark who “carried water to the house where the Last Supper took place” in Mark 14:13, or the “young man who ran away naked when Jesus was arrested” in Mark 14:51. See also Acts 12:25:  “Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem when they had completed their service, bringing with them John, whose other name was Mark.“ Now about the lion being his symbol.

The lion is traditionally “a figure of courage and monarchy.” See also Lion of Saint Mark, which said the symbolism began with Revelation 4:7, “The first living creature was like a lion, the second was like an ox, the third had a face like a man, the fourth was like a flying eagle.” The lion also symbolizes “the power of the Evangelist’s word, the wings symbolize the spiritual elevation, while the halo is the traditional Christian symbol of holiness.” And so to summarize:

In Christianity, the four living creatures are Cherubim. A prominent early interpretation has been to equate the four creatures as a tetramorph of the Four Evangelists where the lion represents Mark the Evangelist, the calf [or “ox”] is Luke the Evangelist, the man is Matthew the Apostle, and the eagle symbolizes John the Evangelist. This interpretation originated with Irenaeus and was adopted by Victorinus.   Its influence has been on art and sculpture and is still prevalent in Catholicism and Anglicanism.

Then there’s that question of “the honor of primacy.” If Mark wrote the first Gospel, why is his listed after Matthew? It’s a story of being “disrespected,” but eventually recognized for his singular contribution. (Thanks to Bible scholars who became open-minded enough to “dig deeper.”) In other words, Mark presents a “Cinderella story,” of success after a lowly beginning.

One reason for his being dissed early on could have been that his was the shortest Gospel. Another reason might be his Koine Greek, not at all elegant. (What Garry Wills called a marketplace or pidgin Greek, a “simplified means of linguistic communication … constructed impromptu, or by convention, between individuals or groups of people.”)

In other words, his written Greek was “short and clumsy.” For this reason and others St. Augustine for one called Mark “the drudge and condenser” of Matthew. And since his Greek was “clumsier and more awkward” – clumsier than the more-polished writing of Matthew, Luke and John – his was the “least cited Gospel” in the early Christian period.  

But “this Cinderella finally got the glass slipper,” even though Mark had to wait until the 19th century to get his. (Metaphorically or otherwise.) That’s when scholars finally noticed that the other three Gospels all cited material from Mark, but “he does not do the same for them.” Their conclusion? He started the process and set the pattern of and for the other three Gospels. Since that time Mark’s Gospel “has become the most studied and influential.”

Another note: It seems that Mark wrote his Gospel at a time of great suffering in the early church. As Asimov noted, Mark’s Gospel was designed “to circulate among Christians the story of the sufferings of Jesus and his steadfastness under affliction. Perhaps this was in order to encourage Christians at a time when they, generally, were undergoing persecution.”

In turn, and as I wrote in 2020, that earthly suffering may well have been mirrored in the unforeseen and largely inexplicable “end times” of the 2020 coronavirus pandemic. And if nothing else, that Covid-19 (or the 2020 extension) reminded us of our “fragility as human beings.” Which brings us to The Plague by Camus, and a quote from Part 1, early in the book:

Everybody knows that pestilences have a way of recurring in the world; yet somehow we find it hard to believe in ones that crash down on our heads from a blue sky. There have been as many plagues as wars in history; yet always plagues and wars take people equally by surprise.

Which certainly seems true of whatever latest pestilence we may be going through. (“Let the reader understand,” from Mark 13:14.) Which brings up a Salt Lake Tribune review of “The Plague” (the Camus novel) with this point: “Being alive always was and will always remain an emergency; it is truly an inescapable ‘underlying condition.'” But there could be a silver lining: The “absurdity” of life – with all its despair at times – could lead to a “tragicomic redemption, a softening of the heart, a turning away from judgment and moralizing to joy and gratitude.”

Which brings us to the old saying noted in the Peanuts cartoon below, reminding us that in “bad times or hopelessness, it is more worthwhile to do some good, however small, in response than to complain about the situation.” See also Better to light a single candle. 

Put another way, April 25 celebrates the man the other three Gospel-writers followed and borrowed so freely from. The man whose work – for 18 long centuries – was largely disregarded and disrespected. The man who finally – after 1,800 years – got the recognition he deserved.

I think there’s an object lesson there…

*   *   *   *

*   *   *   *

The upper image is courtesy of Peter Paul Rubens: The Four Evangelists: “Rubens portrayed the four evangelists while working together on their texts. An angel helps them… Each gospel author can be identified by an attribute. The attributes were derived from the opening verses of the gospels.  From left to right: Luke (bull), Matthew (man [angel]), Mark (lion), and John (eagle).” See also Four Evangelists – Wikipedia.

The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.

Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”

For this post I reviewed 2015’s On St. Mark’s “Cinderella story,” 2016’s More on “arguing with God” – and St. Mark as Cinderella, and later from On St. Mark, 2020 – and today’s “plague” – the Plague being the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. – and On St. Mark – 2024.

The Garry Wills reference to Koine Greek is from What Jesus Meant: Wills, the 2007 book offering an “illuminating analysis for believers and nonbelievers alike.” (Said Goodreads.) The quote is from pages xi-xiii of my Penguin Books edition. See also Pidgin – Wikipedia.

Re:  Isaac Asimov. The quotes cited above are from Asimov’s Guide to the Bible (Two Volumes in One),  Avenel Books (1981), at pages 770 and 902.

From the link Why does Mark say, “Let the reader understand” in Mark 13:14:

The comment to “let the reader understand” in Mark 13:14 could be taken different ways, depending on whose comment it is. It could be a parenthetical comment, inserted by Mark, to signal his readers that Jesus’ prophecy requires discernment and careful consideration. Alternatively, the comment to “let the reader understand” could be part of Jesus’ own words… Either way, the call to “understand” highlights the need for spiritual discernment and preparedness

The “stupid darkness” cartoon is courtesy of You Stupid Darkness! | Kurtis Scaletta’s Site, which links to comics.com/peanuts, “one of the most amazing but little-known Internet resources.”  See also lightasinglecandle … com, and The 5 Greatest (newspaper) Comic Strips Of All Time.

*   *   *   *

As noted in the opening blurb, this blog has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (See John 6:37, with the added, “Anyone who comes to Him.”) This is a consistent theme throughout the Bible. From the Old Testament, Psalm 9:10, “You never forsake those who seek you, O Lord.” (In the Book of Common Prayer version.) The second is that God wants us to live abundantly.  (John 10:10.) The third is that we should do greater miracles than Jesus. (John 14:12). A fourth theme: The only way to do all that is read the Bible with an open mind:

…closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain’s natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a “search and destroy” relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people’s current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable… Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency…

So in plain words, I take issue with what I call “Christian first graders.” Those who choose to stay in a kind of elementary-school first grade. See John the Baptist, ’24 – and “Christian First Graders,” for more. But the key point: “The Bible was designed to expand your mind,” not make it narrow. Also, there’s the idea that “Jesus was anything but negative. His goal was for you to grow and develop into all that you can be.” (For more on that see ABOUT THE BLOG, above.)

I’ve written on boot-camp Christians, the Literalists who never go “beyond the fundamentals.” But the Bible offers so much more than a narrow reading gives… (Unless you want to stay a buck private all your life…) Now, about “Boot-camp Christians” see Conservative Christian – “Career buck private?” The gist of that post: Starting the Bible is like Army Basic Training. You begin by“learning the fundamentals.” But after boot camp, you move on to Advanced Individual Training.”

http://www.toywonders.com/productcart/pc/catalog/aw30.jpg

And as noted in “Buck private,” one of this blog’s themes is that if you want to be all that you can be, you need to go on and explore the “mystical side of Bible reading.*” In other words, exploring the mystical side of the Bible helps you “be all that you can be.” See Slogans of the U.S. Army – Wikipedia, re: the recruiting slogan from 1980 to 2001. The related image at left is courtesy of: “toywonders.com/productcart/pc/catalog/aw30.jpg.”

Re: “mystical.” Originally the “liturgical, spiritual, and contemplative dimensions of early and medieval Christianity.” Mysticism – Wikipedia, and the post On originalism.  (“What the Bible was originally about!”) See also Christian mysticism – Wikipedia, “In early Christianity the term ‘mystikos’ referred to three dimensions, which soon became intertwined, namely the biblical, the liturgical and the spiritual or contemplative… The third dimension is the contemplative or experiential knowledge of God.” As to that “experiential” aspect, see also Wesleyan Quadrilateral – Wikipedia, on the theological reflection method using four sources of spiritual development: scripture, tradition, reason, and “Christian experience.”

For an explanation of the Daily Office – where “Dorscribe” came from – see What’s a DOR?

*   *   *   *