* * * *

* * * *
Welcome to “read the Bible – expand your mind:”
The Book of Common Prayer says that by taking part in Holy Communion, Christians become “very members incorporate in the mystical body” of Jesus. The words “corporate” and “mystical” are key. They show that a healthy church has two sides, with the often-overlooked “mystic” side asking the question, “How do I experience God?” This blog tries to answer that.
It has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (John 6:37.) The second is that God wants us to live lives of abundance.(John 10:10.) The third is that Jesus wants us to read the Bible with an open mind. (As Luke 24:45 says: “Then He [Jesus] opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.”) The fourth theme – another one often overlooked – is that Jesus wants us to do even greater miracles than He did. (John 14:12.)
And this thought ties them together:
The best way to live abundantly and do greater miracles than Jesus is: Read, study and apply the Bible with an open mind. For more see the notes or – to expand your mind – see the Intro.
In the meantime:
Sunday, April 19, 2026 – I came up with the name for this this blog by adding “scribe” to the acronym DOR. (It stands for Daily Office Readings.) But over the years I’ve focused mainly on Feast Days, those days “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church.” Until yesterday. That’s when I again came across Exodus 17.
Verses 1-7 talk about the “Water from the Rock” episode. It came right after Moses said, “they are almost ready to stone me.” (The Israelites, just freed from slavery, were very thirsty.) So, at God’s command Moses struck the Rock and water came miraculously flowing out. But verses 8-16 talk about an event – Amalekites Defeated – that most Bible-readers don’t know about. The part about how Moses was the first to ever say, “it’s only weird if it doesn’t work.”
There’s more on that later, but first a word about the next major Feast Day, for St. Mark coming up next Saturday, April 25. It offers a classic “Cinderella story,” a tale of overcoming a flood of disrespect and on to eventual exoneration and triumph. For one thing, early Church Fathers put Matthew before Mark, assuming his account was first. For another, St. Augustine called Mark “the drudge and condenser” of Matthew, a view that prevailed until scholars finally noticed something. Other Gospels all quoted Mark, but “he does not do the same for them.” As a result – and explained later this week – Mark became “the most studied and influential Gospel.”)
Back to Moses and the Battle of Rephidim. The gist of it – at Exodus 17:8-16 – was how Moses “helped his team win.” The trouble started when the Amalekites launched a sneak attack – not unlike Pearl Harbor – on the Israelites. (They’d just arrived at Rephidim near Mount Sinai.) While Joshua commanded the army, Moses and two buddies went up to the top of a hill to watch:
Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. Whenever Moses held up his hand, Israel prevailed; and whenever he lowered his hand, Am′alek prevailed. But Moses’ hands grew weary; so they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat upon it, and Aaron and Hur held up his hands, one on one side, and the other on the other side; so his hands were steady until the going down of the sun.
Put bluntly, Moses and his “team” started winning when he held his arms up but losing when he let his arms down. (Which sounds a bit like a sports fan today.) But suppose as he did this his wife Zipporah came up the mountain and said, “Moses, you look ridiculous. Do you honestly think holding your hands up like that is going to change the outcome of the battle?”
Short answer? The world as we know it would be much different. If nothing else, if the Amalekites had won, world history would be “worse, much worse.” Moses might never have had the chance to write – or at least finish – the first five books of the Bible, that “most influential, most published, most widely read book in the history of the world.” All of which brings up that famous – or infamous, to some – Bud Light commercial, shown in the image below.
“It’s only weird if it doesn’t work.” And notwithstanding what Zipporah might have said, Moses holding his arms up during the Battle of Rephidim did in fact “work.” But of course, there are opposing views, exemplified by True American Stories: It’s Weird Even If It Works:
Beer companies are notorious for using logical fallacy in their commercials, and Bud Light tried to exploit the superstition… The commercial focuses on football fans doing outlandish rituals that supposedly help their teams win. [It] takes advantage of the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, which falsely attributes a result to an action after the fact… Bud Light ends their commercial with the line, “It’s only weird if it doesn’t work.” This sentence is a strong example of the post hoc fallacy.
Of course, a devout Christian might say, “Hey pal, tell that to Moses!” Or, “Okay, granted, it was weird. But it did work.” Then there’s the early Christian author Tertullian, who once famously said – of the Christian faith in general – Credo quia absurdum, “I believe because it is absurd.”
Sometimes you just have to go with your heart – and believe.
* * * *

* * * *
The upper image is courtesy of Battle of Refidim – Wikipedia. The caption: “John Everett Millais, ‘Victory O Lord!‘ (1871).”
The Book of Common Prayer reference: The “corporate-mystical” prayer is on page 339, the post-communion prayer for Holy Eucharist, Rite I.
Feast days are designated days on the liturgical (church) calendar “set aside to commemorate events, saints, or doctrines that are important in the life of the Church. These can range from Solemnities, which are the highest-ranking feast days like Easter and Christmas, to optional memorials that celebrate lesser-known saints.” Feast Days … the Church’s Calendar. See also Wikipedia’s Calendar of saints. “The calendar of saints is the traditional Christian method of organizing a liturgical year by associating each day with one or more saints and referring to the day as the feast day or feast of said saint. The word ‘feast’ in this context does not mean ‘a large meal, typically a celebratory one,’ but instead ‘an annual religious celebration, a day dedicated to a particular saint.’”
The Book of Common Prayer, at page 934, explains that the Daily Office Lectionary is arranged in a two-year cycle, meaning that if you read the Daily Office on a daily basis you will cover the entire Bible in those two years, and the Psalms and Gospels three to four times. See also Daily Office (Anglican) – Wikipedia. See also Daily Office (Anglican) – Wikipedia.
The full Daily Office readings for Saturday, April 18, 2026, are Psalm 16, 17; PM Psalm 134, 135 Exodus 16:23-36; 1 Peter 3:13-4:6, and John 16:1-15.
Re: “I again came across Exodus 17.” I learned about the Battle of Rephidim from a separate source. But before Saturday, April 18, I don’t remember coming across it in the Daily Office.
Re: Moses striking the Rock. The link – Moses Strikes the Rock in Exodus and Numbers: One Story or Two? – said his doing so was “described in the Torah twice: first soon after the splitting of the Sea (Exod 17:1–7), and again at the end of the forty years of wandering in the wilderness (Num 20:1–13).”
For this post I reviewed 2017’s Moses at Rephidim: “What if?” Also, from 2020’s An unintended consequence – and ‘Victory O Lord!” I also reviewed various links contained in those posts.
See Post hoc ergo propter hoc – Wikipedia, on the “logical error that assumes causation based on temporal succession.”
The lower image is courtesy of Bud Light It’s Only Weird If It Doesn’t Work Image – Image Results. See also Superstitions (advertising campaign) – Wikipedia.
* * * *
As noted in the opening blurb, this blog has four main themes. The first is that God will accept anyone. (See John 6:37, with the added, “Anyone who comes to Him.”) This is a consistent theme throughout the Bible. From the Old Testament, Psalm 9:10, “You never forsake those who seek you, O Lord.” (In the Book of Common Prayer version.) The second is that God wants us to live abundantly. (John 10:10.) The third is that we should do greater miracles than Jesus. (John 14:12). A fourth theme: The only way to do all that is read the Bible with an open mind:
…closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain’s natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a “search and destroy” relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people’s current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable… Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency…
So in plain words, I take issue with what I call “Christian first graders.” Those who choose to stay in a kind of elementary-school first grade. See John the Baptist, ’24 – and “Christian First Graders,” for more. But the key point: “The Bible was designed to expand your mind,” not make it narrow. Also, there’s the idea that “Jesus was anything but negative. His goal was for you to grow and develop into all that you can be.” (For more on that see ABOUT THE BLOG, above.)
I’ve written on boot-camp Christians, the Literalists who never go “beyond the fundamentals.” But the Bible offers so much more than a narrow reading gives… (Unless you want to stay a buck private all your life…) Now, about “Boot-camp Christians” see Conservative Christian – “Career buck private?” The gist of that post: Starting the Bible is like Army Basic Training. You begin by“learning the fundamentals.” But after boot camp, you move on to Advanced Individual Training.”

And as noted in “Buck private,” one of this blog’s themes is that if you want to be all that you can be, you need to go on and explore the “mystical side of Bible reading.*” In other words, exploring the mystical side of the Bible helps you “be all that you can be.” See Slogans of the U.S. Army – Wikipedia, re: the recruiting slogan from 1980 to 2001. The related image at left is courtesy of: “toywonders.com/productcart/pc/catalog/aw30.jpg.”
Re: “mystical.” Originally the “liturgical, spiritual, and contemplative dimensions of early and medieval Christianity.” Mysticism – Wikipedia, and the post On originalism. (“What the Bible was originally about!”) See also Christian mysticism – Wikipedia, “In early Christianity the term ‘mystikos’ referred to three dimensions, which soon became intertwined, namely the biblical, the liturgical and the spiritual or contemplative… The third dimension is the contemplative or experiential knowledge of God.” As to that “experiential” aspect, see also Wesleyan Quadrilateral – Wikipedia, on the theological reflection method using four sources of spiritual development: scripture, tradition, reason, and “Christian experience.”
For an explanation of the Daily Office – where “Dorscribe” came from – see What’s a DOR?
* * * *

















